Daily Fablist (@dailyfablist) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Enrique Colòn frankie ✪ Let Freedom Ring Dan The Halfway Post Sorry, what? 😅 Estonia gave ~2% of their GDP to Ukraine, as did Denmark and Lithuania. The US gave 0.5%, less than 11 EU countries. And if we're talking absolute $$, the EU has also given more total financial aid to Ukraine than the US. Stop spreading Trump propaganda.

Steve W (@steve_w12345) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Ben Zaranko ('Institute for Fiscal Studies' director) - comments as per below + attached article: "An extra 0.2 per cent of GDP is around £6billion, and this is the size of the cut to the aid budget"

Ben Zaranko ('Institute for Fiscal Studies' director) - comments as per below + attached article:

"An extra 0.2 per cent of GDP is around £6billion, and this is the size of the cut to the aid budget"
𝔗𝔯𝔲𝔱𝔥 𝔐𝔞𝔱𝔱𝔢𝔯𝔰 (@politicsusa46) 's Twitter Profile Photo

T Carr The Danish are the top GDP to aid provider to Ukraine. They provide 2.2% of GDP this is in contrast to the US who spent 0.9%. I think it is disappointing you choose to parrot hard right propaganda as opposed to the facts. Have a nice day.

NorthWalesMan (@pldolman) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Nigel Farage MP 0.2% of GDP isn’t £13M it’s closer to £6M ? Why doesn’t he inject the Chagos Islands money to really boost the budget and move much faster.

David Brookfield (大卫) - #NotACat 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 (@dmbrookfield) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Who would have thought a British PM would try to spin an increase of 0.2% of GDP on defence spending as game changing! At a time when the UK is at its weakest it has been since the Crimean war! Keir Starmer must really hate us! For anyone confused this means our Prime minister

Who would have thought a British PM would try to spin an increase of 0.2% of GDP on defence spending as game changing! At a time when the UK is at its weakest it has been since the Crimean war! 
<a href="/Keir_Starmer/">Keir Starmer</a> must really hate us!
For anyone confused this means our Prime minister
Lucy White (@lucyjaynewhite1) 's Twitter Profile Photo

James Cleverly🇬🇧 Here is the accurate figure: 0.2% of GNI (not GDP) would be a saving of £5.3 billion (going by 2022 statistics) Important article on countries we should not send ODA to 👇🏻

MJW (@mattmj1314) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Piers Morgan Keir Starmer Even if you believe that it’s performative nonsense from the PM. If threat increased may I suggest that increased defence spending start now not 2027 and by rather more than 0.2% of GDP. By 2027 2.5 will be less in real terms than 2.3 now as the economy is about to collapse

Fatboy Henry 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🇬🇧 (@redpilluk71) 's Twitter Profile Photo

What a pompous & theatrical speech by Starmer. Your raising defence spending to 2.5% of GDP, that's a 0.2% rise, that's it. Yet our ridiculous PM gives a speech that makes it sound like we're now able to go toe to toe with the Russians on the battlefield. Absolute tool

Sicktothebackteeth (@sicktothebackt1) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Keir Starmer So not £13billion which you said in the Commons 🙄 The 0.2% reduction in foreign aid and 0.2% rise in defence spending, is about £7billion extra a year compared to what would have otherwise been spent had the defence budget remained at its 2.3% of GDP level.

Who Cares (@severegaleforce) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Haven’t heard or seen such melodramatic nonsense from the flakey legacy media than the commentary on moving defence spending up by 0.2% of GDP. We are not anywhere close to a ‘war footing’ ITV News Sky News BBC News (UK) Taking the Labour Party spin, hook line and sinker!

benjamin (@benjit14) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Boris Johnson 0.1% gdp aid West gives Ukraine is 2% of Russia's gdp. It spends 5 x more on its war. The West, including your government, never gave Ukraine enough to win, so sit down and be quite.

Tobias Byfield (@tobiasbyfield) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Wow, I feel so protected by an extra 0.2% of GDP due to begin in 2027 😍 Can't imagine how soul destroying it must be for whichever Labour staffer who has to draft these

John Anderton (@andertonjohn) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Peter Stefanovic We could rejoin the customs union and single market increasing trade and raising an estimated £40bn in taxes annually which would enable defence spending to rise by 0.5 or 0.6 % of GDP. Alternatively maybe 0.4% and add 0.1% or 0.2% to foreign aid. Which is the harder choice ?

Hal Days (@algarve32c) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Rt. Hon Ben Wallace Starmer seems out of touch with the costs of military hardware and munitions, this extra 0.2% will just get swallowed by R&D & Sector inflation outpacing GDP. A typical career politician, useless !

The Protector (@the_protect0r_) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Starmer announces big cut to UK aid budget to boost defence spending ift.tt/5tlo73z PM confirms rise in military spending to 2.5% of GDP by 2027 – three years earlier than planned UK politics live – latest updates Keir Starmer has announced d… ift.tt/u3CbHFi

RayVon 🏉 (@rayvon83016875) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Piers Morgan Keir Starmer 0.2% is significant ! I have a bridge to sell you. By 2027 our gdp will have tanked with this lot so that means a real terms cut. Economics is not your strong point. Most of it will be eaten up by more civil servants in the mod anyway. 🤡🌏

Paweł Skrzypczyński (@p_skrzypczynski) 's Twitter Profile Photo

This data will enable for a more precise setting of Q1 nowcast of economic growth. Overall, seems as of present, that getting real GDP growth in Q1 north of 2.0% q/q saar will be challenging.