Why does the new Artificial Intelligence Safety and Security Board have so many members with clear vested interests in rapid, unregulated AI adoption, and so few who have AI expertise without those vested interests?

These are statistics that prove direct competition in the same markets. Something that a derivative cannot legally do without Copyright Ownership.

“Some of the most harmful applications of AI tools are not hidden on the dark corners of the internet, but are actively promoted to users by social media companies unable or unwilling to enforce their policies about who can buy ads on their platforms.” 404media.co/email/d2bebba9…

A few ethics-related issues, among them:
- Fact vs Fiction: This is rewriting history. Minimally, needs mechanisms in place (C2PA and/or watermarking) so future handling of GenAI images can be marked as such
- Consent: Likeness edited w/o consent
- Disclosure: People need to know

GLAZE 2.0 is out today!! And Glaze for short videos is also in the works!!

This proposed bill from Adam Schiff would require GenAi to disclose ALL COPYRIGHTED WORKS used in data. Tech bros/ GenAI shillers will ofc argue this is terrible (for them) Stealing and unfair competition are not the same as Fair Use.
billboard.com/business/legal…

To quote a friend,
“Just call it a RapeCam.”
#AI
petapixel.com/2024/04/08/thi…

🚨BREAKING: The European Parliament has just APPROVED the AI Act. What everyone should know:

➵ The AI Act follows a risk-based approach. Some AI systems are banned, such as those involving:

- Cognitive behavioral manipulation of people or specific vulnerable groups;
- Social

LOL - this AI risk skit feels just like an AI conference I recently attended… 😜

We need to shift the public’s opinion on why some think this is okay. Creative works are not open source.

MidJourney and OpenAI need to see justice for what they are doing to the entire culture of creativity.

'It doesn't steal, it's transformative!'

axios.com/2024/02/22/cop…

Canada-based University of Waterloo is racing to remove M&M-branded smart vending machines from campus after outraged students discovered the machines were covertly collecting facial-recognition data without their consent. arstechnica.com/tech-policy/20…

All the Generative AI data filling up the internet and search engines needs to be called what it is, Data Pollution.

'...much of the new power will reside in the hands of private companies, not governments accountable to their people.'
time.com/6691662/ai-ukr…

the AI Act will permit many forms of emotion recognition – such as police using AI systems to predict who is or is not telling the truth – despite these systems lacking any credible scientific basis.
reclaimyourface.eu/eu-ai-act-will…

These are 'AI models' distributed for mass-producing sexual deepfakes of Taylor Swift.
AI researchers continue to justify this by saying,
'LEARNING for RESEARCH PURPOSES falls under FAIR USE , therefore it's LEGAL.
The flow of time and technology cannot be stopped.'

Police around the US say they're justified to run DNA-generated 3D models of faces through facial recognition tools to help crack cold cases. Everyone but the cops thinks that’s a bad idea. wired.com/story/parabon-…