This is a magnificently stupid question form Ed Davey How exactly, is a UK Prime Minister going to stop Donald Trump "getting a penny" if, in fact, Trump wins his lawsuit? How will Keir 'guarantee' that Ed? You are either suggesting that the UK Prime Minister interferes

The 'taxpayer' is not footing the bill, the licence payer is. Don't want to enrich Trump? Cancel your BBC licence and stop consuming it's content.

"I'm about to destroy growth by hiking taxes to pay for millions upon millions of foreign nationals in the country, who cost more than they produce (but hey, it is all GDP right?)."

And you thought the Tories were terrible, and that Labour were as white as the driven snow. (you were half right).

Dear Ursula von der Leyen, Don't bother. In 2029, we are going to undo it all.

And how exactly do you stop a private citizen of another country (e.g. Trump) from suing a private country in that foreign country (e.g. the BBC, who have a division int he US), in a foreign court (Presumably Florida). Sorry Ed, you are not making sense.

If they are not from Norway or Hong Kong, then they are not welcome. Go somewhere else. You will be for sure after the next election.

Just to be clear Marcus, what we actually want is zero immigration and the deportation of the millions of people who should not be here. Anything that stands in the way of that goal, is fair game. Piece by piece or all at once.

"silly and unnecessary editing mistake" Mistake. Nah mate, there was no mistake. It was deliberate. What you are doing there is attempting to gaslight.

OK, so Grok imagine is fun.

"Migrant access to benefits will also undergo a consultation" And this is the slimy way in which everything suggested here as a headline will be sidelined. No. No welfare for any foreign national. No get-outs, no exceptions, no weasely ways to get around the system. Deport,

It all smacks of a con though. The metric to use is: Are there less foreign nationals in the UK today than there were yesterday? If no, it is a ruse. If yes, what is the specific number? How does that compare to the number in the country?

"We're going to make that a temporary status that will be reviewed." Can you see where the lie is? Yes, it is the unsaid bit at the end of that sentence. 'will be reviewed every 2 or three years... and then we'll just let you stay anyway.'

Labour MPs: "We need to build 1.5 million houses for migrants at a cost to the tax payer of £250-300 billion pounds." Everyone else: Why don't you just stop inviting them in?

Yes we understand, the Green Party believes in open borders and for the British taxpayer to pay the world's welfare bill.

"they should leave" See what they did there? They are lying to you. This is all words to shut you up for a couple of years - by which time Digital ID will be in, and you WON'T be able to complain about it when the 'should leaves' don't.

Just to be clear, Shabana Mahmood MP, Keir Starmer. Nigel Farage MP, Kemi Badenoch, & Ed Davey Half measures are just not going to cut it.

All part of the fake outrage. They all know that no one is going anywhere, but they complain and whine to make it sound like something is going to happen, to re-enforce the lie.

If you were to sit down and 'imagine' what would be the worst thing you could ever claim Farage has said, and wanted to play into to the fevered dreams of all the people who already hate him, this would be exactly what you would imagine, isn't it? They are not even trying.

Problem you've got, is what we actually want is a Britain built for the British (that is the English, Irish, Scottish and Welsh). And that is what we will be voting for in 2029.