🖐️ No comment…

Safe indoor air isn’t just about sars-2. It’s about preventing other diseases that are already here, as well as future emergences. You’re not going to handwash your way out of an H5N1 pandemic.

Dear World Health Organization (WHO), hand hygiene day is fast approaching.

I don't want to see any unevidenced nonsense statements like in your report where to back up a statement on the importance of hand hygiene you used citations that did not mention hands nor their hygiene.

Why did World Health Organization (WHO) want to change the definition of airborne? Read this: thegauntlet.news/p/the-whos-cla…

Kimberly Prather, Ph.D. Paul D. Thacker And the WHO has still not deleted the tweet below, it was not a mistake, it was a deliberate lie as they had exactly zero study to support their statement that it is a fact this virus is not airborne. When most respiratory viruses are known to be airborne.
twitter.com/marc_g_wathele…

Un mensonge flagrant de l'OMS au début de la crise COVID n'a jamais été corrigé, malgré les preuves contraires.

C'est un mensonge plutôt qu'une erreur car ils disent du virus qu'il ne se transmettrait pas par aérosol comme si c'était un fait, sans se baser sur la moindre étude.

“This document exists to handhold a small group of elite scientists who were incredibly, undeniably, dangerously wrong, and allow them to continue pushing their failed model of “infection control” which does not, in fact, control infections. It exists to assuage their damaged and…

Brilliant piece.

“the threshold of “proof” for airborne spread was unreachably high, while the threshold of “proof” for droplet spread was nothing at all”

In a nutshell

Devastating consequence

Vapid narrative from World Health Organization (WHO) to cover over the shoddy mess won’t cut it

Today's must-read article for all... humans.
thegauntlet.news/p/the-whos-cla…

It just might be the biggest scandal you've never heard of. Read my latest:

'The WHO's claim that COVID wasn't airborne cost millions of lives. Now, they're changing the definition of airborne'
thegauntlet.news/p/the-whos-cla…

Deze wetenschapsjournalist schreef in 2021:
“…alsof sars-cov-2 airborne is. Dat is aantoonbare onzin.”

Tot op de dag van vandaag blijft hij ontkennen dat hij fout was, want, zo klinkt het nu, ‘het virus zou in begin slechts “SOMS airborne” geweest zijn…’🤷‍♂️

Aantoonbare onzin.

Went to the dentist yesterday. Universal masking. All staff N95. Patients in surgical or better. Air filters in each room. UV filtration system in the ceiling. It can be done. Any smart dentist would make a small investment for more business & better health.

And what does the fact that it is left to citizens to uncover and share such telling documents say about the current state of public health journalism?

A good journalist should have brought this up at the beginning of 2020. Why didn't that happen?

This biblical scale 'never event' - calling and insisting on an erroneous unevidenced mode of transmission during a pandemic - merits recognition, regret and remedy by those who committed it, continue to commit it and attempt to rewrite history.

Inexplicable amnesia. If this is really a conspiracy - and it kind of feels like it might be - then it is the dumbest, most self-defeating, most pointless conspiracy ever. I mean, just, WHY?!

It is a most odd phenomenon.

In broad daylight too.