.Matthew A. Seligman in his new op-ed in the The New York Times: “Mr. Vance has made clear that he is willing to cater to Mr. Trump’s obsession with the myth that his victory in the 2020 presidential election was stolen..." nytimes.com/2024/10/01/opi…

“Even more chilling, Mr. Vance’s pledge about what he would have done in Mr. Pence’s place on Jan. 6, 2021, is a promise about what Mr. Vance will do on Jan. 6, 2029, should he preside over the electoral count as vice president.” Me in New York Times Opinion: nytimes.com/2024/10/01/opi…

TODAY’s PRE VP DEBATE MUST READ Why JD Vance is totally disqualified to be VP by Matthew A. Seligman New York Times Opinion

JD Vance has disqualified himself from being VP by pledging he would’ve acted against the Constitution to overturn the 2020 presidential election on January 6, 2021 if he’d been VP instead of Pence — and would do so again on January 6, 2029. Read this NYT piece by Matthew A. Seligman

The power of the vice presidency. JD Vance. The upcoming election. What is the role of the VP? We discuss all of this and more right here on #Lawyer2Lawyer with host @JCraigWilliams from Legal Talk Network and special guest Matthew A. Seligman Stanford Law School legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawye…

THe brilliant Matthew A. Seligman explains why Trump's Jan. 6 trial should go forward and how Trump is planning his 2024 coup. It is already underway. Essential listening youtu.be/x6xkJUjLgTs?si… via YouTube

I spoke with the great Jen 'now @jenrubin9' Rubin about the path forward for Trump’s January 6 criminal case, and what we should—and shouldn’t—worry about in the imminent disputed presidential election of 2024.

Just a great, great chat with ⁦Matthew A. Seligman⁩ on Trump trial and more!

After months of dodging the question, JD Vance now says Donald Trump did not lose the 2020 election. That's a lie. Trump lost, legitimately and lawfully. As I explained in New York Times Opinion, Vance's lie disqualifies him from serving as Vice President. nytimes.com/2024/10/01/opi…

What sort of chaos could erupt, if the voting is close and Fox and other right wing media start amplifying Trump’s inevitable lies about fraud in the election? Greg Sargent Matthew A. Seligman trib.al/9162naO

Very big but not crazy big--in the 2000 page range. And as Matthew A. Seligman points out, have to expect it's everything that could come up at trial, even on rebuttal, b/c they only want to go back up to Sup Ct one more time. But we won't see a lot of it, b/c it's heavily redacted.

Not sure folks grasp how far MAGA's noncitizen-voting lie has gotten. It's being laid as pretext for second steal attempt. This plus elex-deniers getting installed right now as electors! On the pod, Matthew A. Seligman lays out a great roadmap on what's ahead: newrepublic.com/article/187292…