BREAKING: declassified- •handwritten notes, frmr CIA Brennan briefed President Obama including the ‘alleged approval by Hillary Clinton on July 26, 2016 of a proposal to vilify Trump by stirring up scandal claiming interference by Russian security services.’ Mornings with Maria

BREAKING: declassified 9-7-2016, U.S. intel officials forwarded investigative referral to FBI Comey & Strzok re candidate Hillary Clinton's approval of plan4candidate Trump & hackers hampering election as a means of distracting the public from her use of a private mail server.’”

"One has to judge Sen. Graham’s words as a “living” statement, the meaning of which can change under different circumstances with the passage of time. That’s the way RBG regarded the US Constitution." Great quote... and 100% accurate !

As the concerns for the American people align with the US Constitution, yes ! But not as it aligns with Progressives.

"Free in general?" Where does the $$ come for upkeep on the trains, buying new trains, paying the T's employees ???? The required $$ should NOT come from higher taxes on any person who lives in the State.

This is what I said from day one bc I watched them cook it up at the dem convention in 2016. I came home telling friends it was incredible how they all got in line w the lie of collusion after the snails were hacked. Brennan tells Obama HRC approves plan to vilify trump.

Ratcliffe: former CIA Director Brennan briefed President Obama on the Russian assessment, which included the allegation that Clinton approved the plan to tie Trump to the hack of the DNC after it was proposed by one of her foreign policy advisers. Mornings with Maria FOX Business

Trampled our civil rights Wiretapped innocent Americans to entrap trump campaign. They knew they had nothing But they kept pushing, breaking laws, ruining lives bc they were in power. Mornings with Maria FOX Business I was disgusted from the minute I knew the truth 3-years ago

Facebook can ‘save’ our US elections by reminding people they are responsible for their own individual actions, including making their decisions about who to vote for ... and that neither Facebook nor the government should delete any content from the platform

Historically, when the president and the Senate are of the same political party, the president nominates and the Senate confirms Supreme Court justices in election years.

Historically, when the president and the Senate are not of the same political party, the Senate hasn't typically taken up the president's Supreme Court nomination in an election year.

The POTUS should always have preferential treatment on social media. Regardless of how much you hate him, everything he says and does should be recorded for history.

Your company is a platform company ? Really ? rabkinsopinions.com/2020/10/06/you…

If Biden wants to spend my hard-earned money on social programs, be honest about it. Say “we need to help the poor temporarily with tax dollars so they can get better jobs and stand on their own.” Fine, I’m in. But the more you hide behind social-justice jibber-jabber, I'm not.

"When seeking to understand the intent behind a law, a judge or lawyer may place greater weight on legislative history than on text. That method undermines the ideal that America is a nation of laws rather than men." EXCELLENT !!

Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett declared Monday that Americans “deserve an independent Supreme Court that interprets our Constitution and laws as they are written." OMG I LOVE HER !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Now to go much deeper: Here are the moving parts of a full strength digital #employeeexperience. It will take 5-10 years for orgs to organize around this. But it's inevitable all of this will be assembled more holistically: constellationr.com/blog-news/reim… #digitalworkplace #cio #chro

When a Democrat worries a judge is an ‘activist’ they mean that the judge will ACTUALLY uphold the US Constitution.

I don't want Judge Barrett to be an advocate for the "American People." I do want her to be an advocate for the US Constitution. The Judicial Branch is a separate but equal partner to the Executive and Legislative Branches. If that pisses off Democrats, all the better.

A Justice, liberal or conservative, who believes in a "living breathing" Constitution that "evolves" based on the Justice's personal views is not a Justice. They're an unelected politician.