The one time a leader actually wanted to fix the inequalities in society, the media came down on him like a tonne of bricks. Remember the angle analysis?

This also means housing benefit will have to rise to cover it meaning private landlords can also charge higher rents to their tenants on housing benefit. So it’s a policy that benefits landlords

Better if you want an authoritarian government watching your every move. Better if you’re not sick or disabled and unable to work. Better if you can afford the rising bills and don’t use public services like libraries that are getting further cuts

Rachel Reeves has been telling anybody that will listen what she would do for years. Anybody surprised by her acting like a Tory just wasn’t listening. You think you ‘got the Tories out’? You didn’t.

The last round of austerity was allegedly designed to reduce the national debt. The result was it increased the national debt. Austerity doesn’t produce any growth at all. Austerity doesn’t work.

Not sure who needs to hear this but you are NEVER going to be Billionaire. Not even close. Though there is a chance you end up homeless, so maybe have solidarity with the homeless & back policies which help them (as one day those policies could save you!)

Energy and water prices going up. Pensioners lose their heating allowance. Is this what Starmer meant by CHANGE.

I didn’t see Labour on the EU referendum paper. Silly Starmeroid!

Can’t stop going on about him though… because deep down you know he’d be a better PM than that authoritarian tosspot we have now

Hate is very strong word,but I don't understand anyone with conscience saying they like Rachel Reeves.She's being vindictive in extreme to those who can least afford it,and creating massive worries for the old,sick,and vulnerable.When I call her Rancid Reeves, I'm being generous!

Before blocking me 🌹Rebecca Radnor 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 said this… How am I advocating child sexual abuse? I don’t support a party that turns a blind eye to chief advisor Peter Mandelson’s involvement with Epstein. I was not ‘present but not involved’ when Savile was being investigated by the CPS

So far, Rachel Reeves has decided that the following groups should be worse off, i.e. she thinks the Tories were too generous to them 🔹pensioners 🔹social housing tenants 🔹benefits claimants 🔹public sector workers Is this the "change" we were told about?

Never forget. Austerity is a political choice. Labour "rescued" the banks to the tune of a trillion £'s but Starmer chooses to squeeze ordinary people & make them poorer still. The UK economy is NOT a household budget. The UK creates its own currency. It can NEVER go bankrupt.

Thought prices were going down with Labour. People were conned!

This person thinks switching supplier switches the source of the electricity they get despite it coming through exactly the same wires as their neighbours. Energy supplier competition is the biggest con around. It adds an unnecessary middleman to the process

“All our electricity is certified green, and also certified vegan” Savilista brain rot. Electricity comes from a grid and using the same wires that your neighbours use, there’s not a special vegan line on the pylons just to serve customers of this supplier 😂

That’s why we need to start punching up! It’s the government that’s the enemy, we need to hold them to account. The people struggling to get by aren’t the problem, it’s the government and those earning millions that the government refuse to make pay their way

That's always been my biggest worry and that's why we need to make it clear that Starmer is in no way left wing

Keir Starmer

Before the election we were shouting from the rooftops that Starmer offered continuity Toryism