Sean Johnson (@_seanjohnson) 's Twitter Profile
Sean Johnson

@_seanjohnson

Do I dare to eat a peach? You bet! Classical teacher, Co-host of the Close Reads podcast

ID: 538398191

linkhttp://closereads.substack.com calendar_today27-03-2012 18:51:34

1,1K Tweet

149 Followers

153 Following

Sean Johnson (@_seanjohnson) 's Twitter Profile Photo

My kids and I loved Alicia E. Stallings' translation of The Battle between the Frogs and the Mice (and how many translations of Greek poetry have an unmissable Introduction!?). My write-up is at the Forma Journal: tinyurl.com/ybxuukjz

David Kern (@dakern) 's Twitter Profile Photo

As always, proud to publish work by my man Sean Johnson, this time considering the great Robert Capon whose 95 birthday just passed. formajournal.substack.com/p/amateur-apos…

Sean Johnson (@_seanjohnson) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Ready for more Capon? Check out the champs Mockingbird singlehandedly keeping some of his best work in print! formajournal.substack.com/p/amateur-apos…

Sean Johnson (@_seanjohnson) 's Twitter Profile Photo

[Woke Xian magazine] names annual lecture series after [writer who came to faith for the pretty buildings and made up the rest as she went].

Thomas S. Kidd (@thomasskidd) 's Twitter Profile Photo

As a historically Christian institution or denomination, you may decide it is _right_ to adopt the exact same positions as dominant secular powers in business, academia, and entertainment. But please don't act like doing so is _courageous_.

Josh RR Jokien (@joshcarlosjosh) 's Twitter Profile Photo

A message from those trapped at Burning Man has just been released: "They have taken the bridge and the second hall. We have barred the gates but cannot hold them for long. The ground shakes. We cannot get out. A shadow moves in the dark. We cannot get out. They are coming!"

Jonathan Pageau (@pageaujonathan) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Let's post this again. When someone tells you that the Enlightenment thinkers they don't like are "counter-enlightenment", they are coping for the simple fact that reason is not sufficient, which is why the Enlightenment contains both sides, a reason side, and a "magic" side.

Let's post this again.  When someone tells you that the Enlightenment thinkers they don't like are "counter-enlightenment", they are coping for the simple fact that reason is not sufficient, which is why the Enlightenment contains both sides, a reason side, and a "magic" side.