Anyway, back to the coverage. This was the dawn of what I like to call “experts say” reporting, where an outlet finds someone with credentials who agrees with them to make the point the outlet wants to make.

Here’s National Geographic, Forbes, CBS News & The Washington Post doing that here.

Scientific American doesn't cover the Cass Review -- 'cass report' and 'cass review' net zero Google hits -- but instead, the week after its release, it publishes an interview with an activist who believes kids should have full medical automony and that interpreting scientific…

American journalism is doing great -- no problems or blind spots at all

This is the most evil story I can remember from Covid.

His name was Garnet Harper.

Canada killed this 35-year-old father of 5 because he refused to get vaccinated.

After denying him a kidney (he had 2 of them lined up from his brothers, so he wouldn't be taking another…

This article is written in a truly astonishing manner given that the available evidence, including on the video, suggests the young man in question opened fire at police before any of them shot at him (you can see cops fleeing in the video). You have to read the article with a…

Again, Pearl is the modern equivalent of a member of a freak show. Her tweets are awful on purpose because that’s how she gets attention.

“See the worst tweets you’ve ever witnessed! A nickel a gander!”

This painting is over 100 years old.

It was made by a Swedish illustrator called John Bauer, one of the most important artists you've never heard of.

His revolutionary art influenced everything from graphic novels to animated films to video games, and here's why...

Many people hate God precisely because of his mercy

I'm not sure there is any example, in modern journalism, of activists more effectively steamrolling reporters than in the youth gender medicine debate. It's now *routine* for major outlets to report ideologically fueled opinions as objective facts.

So many outlets will emerge…

Princeton researcher.

If I tried to explain *any* of this to a normal, non-online person, they would absolutely think I was lying or exaggerating. That's how utterly gonzo it all is, and how far gone these folks are in terms of their dishonesty, their delusion, or both.

Matthew Parris says the quiet part out loud about euthanasia: “we simply cannot afford extreme senescence or desperate infirmity for as many such individuals as our society is producing.”

🚨The gap in life expectancy between US men & women (5.9 yrs) is largest since 1997. Male deaths from Covid, heart disease &suicide are driving the widening gap. We have 8 federal offices on women’s health. 0 for men. So what does Biden administration do? whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/…

We use elevated suicide risk as a reason to cater policy directly for the benefit of certain populations

Why is it ignored in this case?

If the suicide rate for white males is quite literally 10x that for black females? Isn’t that a societal issue?

Worth repeating: The excuse 'I didn't write the headline' is bullshit. If your name is on a piece and you think the headline misrepresents your points or is bad, demand it is changed or have your piece pulled. Otherwise, you lose the right to complain that people are mad.

'White men must be stopped: The very future of mankind depends on it' ....

Woops, they want to move on now.

“Virtue – even attempted virtue – brings light; indulgence brings fog.”

– C.S. Lewis, Mere Christianity

OH NO

Wow, Adam Rubenstein is an evil mastermind. Somehow knowing his fortunes were about to take a turn for the worse at the Times, he fabricated a story and told it to three different people BEFOREHAND. Good and thoughtful investigative work by Hobbes as always.

Not “people started snapping their fingers in acclamation” deiwhdhfjk 😭

Oh it’s so cruel to be parentified by a “low quality embryo”

As a mum of a boy with Down syndrome, here’s my take: fuck you and your fake nazi tears.