Daniel Reichert-Facilides (@dfacilides) 's Twitter Profile
Daniel Reichert-Facilides

@dfacilides

NY & Hamburg Bar • #SovereignDebt Reform, Energy & Infrastructure Finance

ID: 1356668879985115137

calendar_today02-02-2021 18:20:53

280 Tweet

246 Takipçi

202 Takip Edilen

Daniel Reichert-Facilides (@dfacilides) 's Twitter Profile Photo

🙏🙏 I don’t think it would, for the reasons you’ve mentioned. But it would have been easy to capture the HRB scenario by expanding the good-faith cooperation requirement in 489-a to a standstill provision. As 489-a has apparently been dropped, the law will have much less impact.

Daniel Reichert-Facilides (@dfacilides) 's Twitter Profile Photo

I follow the analysis & agree on the importance of rules - but even after re-reading the paper, I struggle a bit to imagine what exactly the new rules would say. Any chance for the basics to be spelled out in normative language to accelerate the discussion? Brad Setser

Daniel Reichert-Facilides (@dfacilides) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Parallel negotiations with different creditor groups now look like a realistic idea to improve the sovereign debt restructuring process. Here’s how a set of rules for the #CoordinatedFramework proposed by Sean Hagan and Brad Setser might read. 🙏🙏Robin Wigglesworth and FT Alphaville

Daniel Reichert-Facilides (@dfacilides) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Favorite quote from a new favorite episode of C&C: ‚Having creditors being able to move first and remove [the] sequential aspect that's been plaguing the sovereign debt restructuring process is another argument that we need some more clarity on the comparability assessment.‘

Daniel Reichert-Facilides (@dfacilides) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Not surprising, given the twists and turns of NY sovereign debt bills. Shows that any such legislation must apply irrespective of governing contract law as a matter of public policy to have a real impact. dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4…

Daniel Reichert-Facilides (@dfacilides) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Well, it’s always been a legal right, just subject to a higher threshold. But NY lawmakers should indeed take note: If they want to proceed, they should follow the lead of the UK Debt (Dev Cts) Relief Act, which essentially enforced CoT & applies irrespective of governing law.

Gregory Makoff (@gmakoff) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Heading into New York's 2025 legislative session, it's a good time to review what we learned during the 2023 and 2024 sessions about sovereign debt reforms at the state level. Mossavar-Rahmani Center for Business & Government hks.harvard.edu/centers/mrcbg/…

Daniel Reichert-Facilides (@dfacilides) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Compelling case for enhanced use of domestic currency debt by emerging market borrowers 👇 #3. could be further expanded to using domestic currency debt as a simplified form of VRIs in sov debt restructurings. That wld also address concerns expressed in imf.org/-/media/Files/… x.com/kpatricio_/sta…

Finance for Development Lab (@findevlab) 's Twitter Profile Photo

🚨 New Blog! 🚨 Daniel Reichert-Facilides examines key shifts in the FfD4 Outcome Document's paragraph 50 on sovereign debt. Discover what it means for global finance. Read more via link in comments👇 #FfD4 #DevelopmentFinance #Legislation #Finance