The discussion around Tate reminds me of the discussion around JSN coming out of college. Also Jefferson a bit. No elite traits. Can’t play outside consistently. Not worth the premium pick. Ignore the talk now just like then. He’s good, and a low bust probability! Draft him!

The imago dei includes a free will. It cannot be understood apart from one.

Me staring at my tv after the Titans trade back and select a CB

Excellent

I’ll never be able to look at it the same

If you hate the Tate pick, give it like 15 minutes

This is gonna be a highlight reel for years to come!

We’re 5 deep now with WRs that can excite you with their highlights, and the best part? They can each play in the spot they’re best in.

Well when you put it like that

Feels Packers-esque with Bengals upside if Ridley has a go-out-with-a-bang year as a WR2.

They are talking about it on the ESPN broadcast, but they aren't quite nailing it. The #Titans are about to have a defensive front with: Jeffery Simmons: 6'4, 305 lb. John Franklin-Myers: 6'4, 280 lb. Keldrick Faulk: 6'6, 276 lb. Jermaine Johnson: 6'4, 254 lb. That is a BIG

My early dream haul that I gave up on when the Love at 4 talk really sunk in.

Yes. Thank you. Exactly. Coaching matters, and Tate had pro coaching.

The only P4 WR prospects since 2018 with a passer rating when targeted > 140.00, a contested catch rate > 68.00%, and a missed tackle rate > 20.00% in their 'best' college season.. 🔘 Carnell Tate, Ohio State 🔘 Justin Jefferson, LSU 🔘 AJ Brown, Ole Miss 🔘 Jaxon Smith-Njigba,

Prime example of the issue analytics has. The issue isn’t the numbers themselves, the problem is when we forget that the numbers only exist to analyze people better. When the data and metrics become an end to themselves, they become a distraction from the point. People win games

As a young layman myself who spends large amounts of my free time studying theology and philosophy, he’s dead right. Reading a book doesn’t make you an expert, and it’s not ivory tower gatekeeping to say theology is HARD work. I’ve used the craftsman analogy myself before.

Every time with the Ohio State guys man. JSN, Egbuka, if they don’t run 4.3 they’re “slot only” or “not a WR1”.

I’m glad Brinker is gone. But that doesn’t mean I think he was a weasel. I just think he muddied the situation and filled a role that shouldn’t have existed. His role was unnecessary and complicated an already terrible mess. And on top of that I think he did a bad job.

Getting out ahead of the discussion on this, you can’t change my mind. We should want the starting 5 Offensive Line in week 1 to be the same 5 in week 17. I do not care if the rookies are exciting and develop well, if they’re not ready week 1, I don’t want to break continuity.

And for a large part, Roman Catholics agree with this general assessment. A lot of Roman Catholics today will admit reform was needed, they just disagree with how it went about and some of the extremes it went to.