Tatu Lund (@tatulund) 's Twitter Profile
Tatu Lund

@tatulund

(PhD.) Software business and product development professional, sportaholic and culture afficienado.

ID: 385393331

linkhttp://www.linkedin.com/in/tatulund calendar_today05-10-2011 12:32:33

7,7K Tweet

309 Followers

204 Following

Rogerio Robetti (@rrobetti) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Java is one of the best languages for AI-assisted coding. Not because it’s trendy — but because LLMs learn from patterns, and Java has decades of consistent, structured, real-world code. Better patterns → better predictions → better code. 👉 shorturl.at/pDBxl

Java is one of the best languages for AI-assisted coding.
Not because it’s trendy — but because LLMs learn from patterns, and Java has decades of consistent, structured, real-world code.
Better patterns → better predictions → better code.
👉 shorturl.at/pDBxl
Yoshik K (@askyoshik) 's Twitter Profile Photo

everyone thought ai will 2–3x engineering output, but when you actually look at real data across companies, usage went up massively and the output barely moved, around 10% improvement, which is honestly what most engineers already feel day to day so yes ai makes small tasks

everyone thought ai will 2–3x engineering output, but when you actually look at real data across companies, usage went up massively and the output barely moved, around 10% improvement, which is honestly what most engineers already feel day to day

so yes ai makes small tasks
Rohan Paul (@rohanpaul_ai) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Wharton’s latest AI study points to a hard truth: “AI writes, humans review” model is breaking down Why "just review the AI output" doesn't work anymore, our brains literally give up. We have started doing "Cognitive Surrender" to AI - Wharton’s latest AI study points to a hard

Wharton’s latest AI study points to a hard truth: “AI writes, humans review” model is breaking down

Why "just review the AI output" doesn't work anymore, our brains literally give up.

We have started doing "Cognitive Surrender" to AI - Wharton’s latest AI study points to a hard
Kareem Carr, Statistics Person (@kareem_carr) 's Twitter Profile Photo

The rapid advances we see in AI-derived mathematical proofs are almost certainly not representative of science in general. A core driver of these advances is that AI-derived proofs can be translated into a highly structured human-designed verification language, which can then be

Allen Holub @allenholub.bsky.social (@allenholub) 's Twitter Profile Photo

I've just read about "tokenmaxing," which uses the number of LLM tokens you blow through in a month as a sort of sick productivity metric. This is insane. One of the posts I read inadvertently characterized it perfectly: "Engineers are starting to compare token spending the way

Marcus Hellberg (@marcushellberg) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Cool side-benefit of using signals for state management in Vaadin: state is persisted across code hot swaps 🤩 (even scroll position is preserved!)

Erkka Railo 🇺🇦 (@erkkarailo) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Eikö se ollut joku juttu, että Suomen ei pidä tehdä ”liikaa” vihreän siirtymän hyväksi, koska ei Kiinakaan tee? Nyt on sellainen tilanne, että me ollaan kuulkaa tippumassa Kiinan kyydistä aivan totaalisesti.

Mattia Nelles (@mattia_n) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Oleksandr Yakovenko, the founder of TAF Industries, one of Ukraine's largest drone makers wrote a good response to Rheinmetall's Papperger's irritating statement. I used AI to translate it for you. It is worth reading in full. "Dear Mr. Armin Papperger, CEO of Rheinmetall,

Muhammad Ayan (@socialwithaayan) 's Twitter Profile Photo

MIT's Nobel Prize-winning economist just published a model with one of the most alarming conclusions in the AI literature so far. If AI becomes accurate enough, it can destroy human civilization's ability to generate new knowledge entirely. Not gradually degrade it. Collapse

MIT's Nobel Prize-winning economist just published a model with one of the most alarming conclusions in the AI literature so far.

If AI becomes accurate enough, it can destroy human civilization's ability to generate new knowledge entirely.

Not gradually degrade it. Collapse
Chidanand Tripathi (@thetripathi58) 's Twitter Profile Photo

A software engineer who wrote the code that landed humanity on the moon realized one terrifying truth: You cannot predict every error, but you can dictate exactly how the system reacts to them. Her name is Margaret Hamilton, the woman who famously coined the term "software

A software engineer who wrote the code that landed humanity on the moon realized one terrifying truth:

You cannot predict every error, but you can dictate exactly how the system reacts to them.

Her name is Margaret Hamilton, the woman who famously coined the term "software
Allen Holub @allenholub.bsky.social (@allenholub) 's Twitter Profile Photo

We don't spend enough time thinking about strategic planning around the actual cost of using an LLM. The AI companies are effectively borrowing $1,000 for every $1 of revenue. That's clearly not sustainable, and we need to be thinking strategically about how to handle the

Dr Milan Milanović (@milan_milanovic) 's Twitter Profile Photo

𝗗𝗼𝗲𝘀 𝗔𝗜-𝗣𝗼𝘄𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝗖𝗼𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗧𝗿𝗮𝗱𝗲 𝗦𝗽𝗲𝗲𝗱 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗧𝗲𝗰𝗵𝗻𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗗𝗲𝗯𝘁? Developers report 10x productivity gains from AI coding agents, yet a Carnegie Mellon study of 806 open-source GitHub repositories found something different. Researchers compared

𝗗𝗼𝗲𝘀 𝗔𝗜-𝗣𝗼𝘄𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝗖𝗼𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗧𝗿𝗮𝗱𝗲 𝗦𝗽𝗲𝗲𝗱 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗧𝗲𝗰𝗵𝗻𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗗𝗲𝗯𝘁?

Developers report 10x productivity gains from AI coding agents, yet a Carnegie Mellon study of 806 open-source GitHub repositories found something different.

Researchers compared
Om Patel (@om_patel5) 's Twitter Profile Photo

SOMEONE ACTUALLY MEASURED HOW MUCH DUMBER CLAUDE GOT. THE ANSWER IS 67%. the data shows Opus 4.6 is thinking 67% less than it used to. anthropic said nothing until the numbers went public. then suddenly Boris Cherny (creator of Claude Code) shows up on the GitHub issue. users

SOMEONE ACTUALLY MEASURED HOW MUCH DUMBER CLAUDE GOT. THE ANSWER IS 67%.

the data shows Opus 4.6 is thinking 67% less than it used to.

anthropic said nothing until the numbers went public. then suddenly Boris Cherny (creator of Claude Code) shows up on the GitHub issue.

users
Andrej Karpathy (@karpathy) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Judging by my tl there is a growing gap in understanding of AI capability. The first issue I think is around recency and tier of use. I think a lot of people tried the free tier of ChatGPT somewhere last year and allowed it to inform their views on AI a little too much. This is

M (@missmi1973) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Andrej Karpathy According to OpenAI's own data and a Harvard NBER study, coding queries account for only about 4% of ChatGPT messages, while non-work queries make up over 73%. For non-coding use cases, even $200/month subscribers have experienced stagnation or regression from 2025 through

<a href="/karpathy/">Andrej Karpathy</a> According to OpenAI's own data and a Harvard NBER study, coding queries account for only about 4% of ChatGPT messages, while non-work queries make up over 73%. 

For non-coding use cases, even $200/month subscribers have experienced stagnation or regression from 2025 through
Pirat_Nation 🔴 (@pirat_nation) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Linux sets rules for AI-generated code After months of debate, the Linux community has agreed on clear rules for using AI-generated code. Tools like GitHub Copilot are allowed, but maintainers have made it clear that low-quality “AI slop” will not be accepted. > “Humans take

Linux sets rules for AI-generated code

After months of debate, the Linux community has agreed on clear rules for using AI-generated code.

Tools like GitHub Copilot are allowed, but maintainers have made it clear that low-quality “AI slop” will not be accepted.

&gt; “Humans take
Aiden Tech (@iam_aiden0) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Two major scientific journals just published the most comprehensive studies ever done on AI persuasion. The findings were published simultaneously in Nature and Science. AI can change your political opinions. More effectively than another human can. And when it knows personal

Two major scientific journals just published the most comprehensive studies ever done on AI persuasion.

The findings were published simultaneously in Nature and Science.

AI can change your political opinions. More effectively than another human can. And when it knows personal
Jari Sarasvuo (@sarasvuojari) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Ennen vasemmistoälyköissä oli kunnollisuutta. He arvostivat työntekoa. Kirjassaan Conquest of Happiness (1930) Bertrand Russel pohtii itsekunnioitusta ja työn merkitystä onnellisuudelle. Synteesi meni suurin piirtein näin: Ilman itsekunnioitusta ei ole todellista

Yann LeCun (@ylecun) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Dario is wrong. He knows absolutely nothing about the effects of technological revolutions on the labor market. Don't listen to him, Sam, Yoshua, Geoff, or me on this topic. Listen to economists who have spent their career studying this, like Aghion Philippe , Erik Brynjolfsson ,

Johanna Kukka (@johannakukka) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Tiedätkö, mikä on Brandolinin laki? (hevonpaskan epäsymmetrisyysperiaate) Huuhaan kumoamisen vaatima energia on kertaluokkaa suurempi kuin sen tuottamisen. Huuhaan levittäminen on vaivatonta, kumoaminen vaativaa. ”Yksi hullu kysyy enemmän kuin kymmenen viisasta ehtii vastata”🤓