is it just me, or is there something innately satisfying about seeing a bunch of union relations materialize into a single table in a DAG? ▭ ╠══ ▭ ▭ | ╠══ ✨ ▬▬ ✨ ▭ | ╠══ ▭ ▭ —— 💃symmetry in motion 💃 ——

Wordle 200 3/6 🟨🟨⬛⬛🟨 🟩🟨🟨⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 decided to see what these little squares were about (beginner's luck)

"What happens if we invest in our software engineers and they leave?" vs "What happens if we tell candidates that we invest in software engineers? And it's only natural some of them left. We're proud that our alumni works at BigTech, WellKnownUnicorn, FounderOfExcitingStartup."

non-data person: “What’d you get up to this weekend?” me: “I spent the weekend playing with pandas” 🐼 (aka: just another Monday where I attempt to make a typical weekend sound way more exciting than it was)

I ought to stop naming columns occurred_at because I almost always forget the second 'r' when I'm quickly ad hoc-ing a query for which I am prompty greeted by the DB, "Error: invalid identifier 'OCCURED_AT'". Same goes for the column name 'referrer'. Spelling is hard.