The TLDR version of my response: "Hey, observers, what is the machine doing?" We can't tell, it's ambiguous. "Hey, computer, what are you doing?" 1. no response 2. 🤷‍♂️ ("I don't know") 3. Well, let me tell you...

Why do philosophers talk about the “crisis in physics” but not address the crisis in metaphysics? Zeno’s paradox is clearly a metaphysical argument that is wrong. How many others are there? How do the philosophers know?

God created asymmetry (creature/created, light/dark, good/evil) as well as symmetry (balance, repetition, harmony). It was good that He did this.

If PSA is true then PSR¹ is also true. ¹ Resurrection

“It looks like a burnt marshmallow.” Welcome home Crew-9.

I just caught Grok making a serious mistake. It computed a term as 1/12, instead of -1/12. Had I not already known this was wrong and relied on it instead, my spaceship would have blown up, my bridge would have collapsed, my patient died.

If you want to see just how bad Grok is at something, ask it to do the following: "Draw a simple Necker cube. Use 12, and only 12, identical black lines. No shading. Preserve the optical illusion." It simply cannot do that.

Christian salvation isn’t about “going to heaven.” It’s about “inheriting the promise to Abraham.”

Egalitarianism/complementarianism debates remind me of the wave/particle debates in physics. In both cases it isn’t either/or, it’s both/and. That may make heads explode, but the physicists learned to live with it.

I taught my niece how to drive a stick. She now flies planes. Should I not fly with her in the pilot’s seat?

If a creature is wired to think it’s free, is it free?

If Israel’s ABM systems had Grok’s self-proclaimed “precision,” Israel would be in smoking ruins right now.

The question that must be answered for each hermeneutic is how it deals with Ephesians 3:3-6. Paul claims that there is mystery that was unknown until apostolic times - a mystery that no hermeneutic could uncover - namely, that Gentiles are full heirs to the promise to Abraham of

I am rapidly coming up the conclusion that neither Arminians nor Dispensationalists can correctly articulate what distinguishes the children of the flesh from the children of the promise (Rom. 9:8). Even grok initially had trouble, but eventually got it right.

The constants are measured by arbitrary units. 𝒄, for example, is 1.8026 × 10¹² furlongs/fortnight. Just set 𝒄, ħ, and 𝑮 to 1.

E-book publishers should train an AI on the books that they sell so that if I buy one, I can search and ask questions about that book. While leaking the text of the book is a problem that needs to be solved, they know that I’ve bought the book and can grant query access rights.

Paul’s argument in Roman’s 9 is that the Israel that is truly Israel consists of the promised children. Paul’s argument in Ephesians is that there are Gentile children of the promise, too. God’s not a liar. You just done understand the Abrahamic Covenant like Paul does.

Why do people hate Calvinism? A non-Calvinist just told me that systems that invoke divine fiat are flawed. Divine fiat is never wrong. Adam and Eve learned that the hard way.

Calvinism in a sentence: “You and your promised children will inherit the promised land.”