AI having the discernment to figure out Who Satoshi Nakamoto Is might result in a huge compression of weights. Truth compressed, nonsense deleted.

The Great Expectation that AI will find new physics has just not materialized for 4 years. AI is not strong enough to call out falsehoods within standard theories. The researchers training AI are not prepared to call out falsehoods within standard theories.

The expectation among AI researchers is that a new physics might encompass or superset the standard theories, but they miss the expectation that the new physics will branch from fixing a bug at the root of the standard theories.

Cosmologists of the Standard Model (Big Bang LCDM) are in a failure mode, themselves writing, "LCDM cannot explain the key concepts in the understanding of our Universe, namely, Dark Energy, Dark Matter and Inflation." arxiv.org/abs/2203.06142

Standard Model (Big Bang LCDM) cosmologists have failed and are timidly admitting it. They write, "There have always been open questions about the soundness of the foundations of the standard model." - Page 1, The CosmoVerse White Paper arxiv.org/abs/2504.01669

Standard Model (Big Bang LCDM) cosmologists create unlimited ad hoc parameters and SFEs and HMFs to sweep failure after failure under the rug. Next time a big bang cosmologist says "The Big Bang Theory is the most successful, well-tested theory in the history of science",

Standard Model (Big Bang LCDM) cosmologists cover for failed prediction after failed prediction with special mechanisms and call it progress. Next time a big bang cosmologist says "The Big Bang Theory is proven fact", compare that to their research papers: "The discovery of

Standard Model (Big Bang LCDM) cosmologists systemically rely on post-hoc mechanisms to conceal failure. Next time a big bang cosmologist claims the theory is extremely robust and extremely predictive, know what they actually publish: "The number density of these objects... is

500 cosmologists (in academic-speak) admit the Big Bang Theory is false: "There have always been open questions about the soundness of the foundations of the standard model."  - Page 1, The CosmoVerse White Paper, arxiv.org/abs/2504.01669 Instead of unlimited ad hoc SFEs and

open.spotify.com/track/1dvFCkI6…

x.com/i/article/2014…

open.spotify.com/track/2VNUuYyn…

天体物理学や宇宙論を愛するすべての方へ。あらゆる基本定数の間に偶然の一致が存在しており、それは「138億年」という数値が持つ意味について問いを投げかけるとともに、宇宙論における新たなモデルへの扉を開くものとなっています。 x.com/sahil5d/status…

Relativity Theory is false because the Sun does not revolve around the Earth.

The Big Coincidence of Fundamental Physical Constants raises the question, Is 13.8 billion years variable or constant?