No, never—not even once. This is either an edge case or someone who does not know what they are doing.

I think it depends on your use case. My daughter’s college is 750 miles away and full FSD is great on such road trips. Lane changes that are automated or turn-signal initiated are so much better with FSD. It is priced too high, though.

While Hyundai has great tech, Tesla’s design language under Franz von Holzhausen is more refined and their software is superior.

Any word on the cash burn to build and run the network? It must be incredibly high.

I was considering painting white lines on my driveway before seeing this proof of concept.

I can’t help but be a fan of the safest, best performing and frequently improved by software updates that all Tesla’s have in their DNA.

At least it is not gas-powered.

Liars are gonna lie.

I have absolutely no faith in BP to get this right.

That “U-turn” just took how many miles of the tires? Also it is ugly, inefficient and overly complex. That’s a pass for me.

Rivian could not bring it to production because if the traction is uneven the car will violently lurch in an unpredictable direction. It also destroys expensive tires.

Electric vehicles are out of this world!

For most use cases hydrogen is a terrible choice.

Why does the average Super Charger site in China have only 3 stalls? Is the their electric grid or something else?

Except in 2 very important areas: crash protection and software. Both are super important to me.

Everyone in New York, New Jersey and Connecticut knows that the Post is not a newspaper. It is more like the National Inquirer. Just sayin’.

Neither. They are both inefficient and overweight.

Sorry, but the Model Y or Model X are much better for long road trips. The significant other is right.

Seems like a problem of choosing a bad supplier and not a problem with EV technology.

When you don’t understand the assignment.