Raymond Tarlton (@raytarlton) 's Twitter Profile
Raymond Tarlton

@raytarlton

crim defense & civil rights lawyer | fmr federal public defender| tech enthusiast

ID: 101147346

calendar_today02-01-2010 05:34:50

4,4K Tweet

349 Followers

797 Following

Marjorie Taylor Greene 🇺🇸 (@mtgreenee) 's Twitter Profile Photo

It didn’t have to be this way!!! But going to war in Iran for Israel and things like driving cost of gas to $4/gallon nationally and the cost of beef higher per pound than minimum wage has consequences. Put America FIRST and do what you promised!!!

Mikli (@cryptomikli) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Martin Shkreli reveals he spent $20,000,000 on lawyers for his case “I had this great lawyer, Ben Brafman. As you know, he represents a lot of hiphop guys, including Puff Daddy, which was maybe his crowning achievement, getting that acquittal. Brafman’s a brilliant guy, a

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸 (@repmtg) 's Twitter Profile Photo

On Orthodox Easter, President Trump attacked the Pope because the Pope is rightly against Trump’s war in Iran and then he posted this picture of himself as if he is replacing Jesus. This comes after last week’s post of his evil tirade on Easter and then threatening to kill an

On Orthodox Easter, President Trump attacked the Pope because the Pope is rightly against Trump’s war in Iran and then he posted this picture of himself as if he is replacing Jesus.
This comes after last week’s post of his evil tirade on Easter and then threatening to kill an
Patrick Jaicomo (@pjaicomo) 's Twitter Profile Photo

It’s always satisfying to get the hard copies of Supreme Court booklets. When police destroy the property of innocent folks while searching for a fugitive, who should pay: the gov’t or the innocent owner? In Institute for Justice's Hadley v. South Bend and Pena v. LA, SCOTUS should decide.

It’s always satisfying to get the hard copies of Supreme Court booklets.

When police destroy the property of innocent folks while searching for a fugitive, who should pay: the gov’t or the innocent owner?

In <a href="/IJ/">Institute for Justice</a>'s Hadley v. South Bend and Pena v. LA, SCOTUS should decide.
Eric W. (@ewess92) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Can Judge Boasberg sanction U.S. Department of Justice attorneys for following his own written order? No, explains the D.C. Circuit. Judges Rao and Walker grant the extraordinary writ of mandamus stopping the ongoing contempt proceedings. Long overdue. Judge Childs dissents in 80 pages.

Can Judge Boasberg sanction <a href="/TheJusticeDept/">U.S. Department of Justice</a> attorneys for following his own written order? No, explains the D.C. Circuit. Judges Rao and Walker grant the extraordinary writ of mandamus stopping the ongoing contempt proceedings. Long overdue. Judge Childs dissents in 80 pages.
Roger Parloff (@rparloff) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Yesterday ACLU filed this interesting damages suit for an engineer on an H-1B visa who was dragged from his car & detained under Operation Catch-of-the-Day. Sues under Maine's Civil Rights Act for illegal stop & detention, excessive force, race discrim. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…

Mike P (@mikepat711) 's Twitter Profile Photo

> Own a Tesla > Wake up in a hotel in a city you’ve never been to before > Google “coffee shop nearby” in bed on phone, select “directions,” tap “share,” tap “send to Tesla.” > Get up, shower, pack suitcase. > Get in Tesla, put on seatbelt, tap “start self driving,” sit there and

Raymond Tarlton (@raytarlton) 's Twitter Profile Photo

this mayor getting elected is evidence trickle down economics (👇) isn’t working well in NYC , may be constitutional problems with some of these bold tax plans but IMO rich aren’t going to flee a place like this, better for them to have creative ideas on cost of living issues

Jimmy Hoover (@jimmyhooverdc) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Chief Justice Roberts dropped in on a UVA law class Tuesday taught by his old Hogan & Hartson colleague Cate Stetson, fielding students questions for about 45 minutes. One student thought it was “a prank at first,” per school write-up.

Orin Kerr (@orinkerr) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Chatrie's reply brief has been filed. It leans in pretty heavily to the idea that TOS control 4A rights—or at least, that favorable TOS create 4A rights, by creating a property right in data. Stay tuned, as always. supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/25/2…

Chatrie's reply brief has been filed.  It leans in pretty heavily to the idea that TOS control 4A rights—or at least, that favorable TOS create 4A rights, by creating a property right in data. Stay tuned, as always. 
supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/25/2…
Sean Marotta (@smmarotta) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Okay. So what is wild about this is that petitioner was represented at the petition and merits stage—all the way through the reply brief—by Kannon Shanmugam. So why change firms and advocates for just argument?

Orin Kerr (@orinkerr) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Officer initiates traffic stop b/c car was stopped on 1-lane bridge. Asks about guns in the car, and both driver & passenger say they have guns. Officer retrieves the guns. Turns out, passenger has a felony. CA4, 2-1: Asking about the gun was not permitted, gun is suppressed. #N

Officer initiates traffic stop b/c car was stopped on 1-lane bridge. Asks about guns in the car, and both driver &amp; passenger say they have guns. Officer retrieves the guns. Turns out, passenger has a felony. CA4, 2-1: Asking about the gun was not permitted, gun is suppressed. #N
Orin Kerr (@orinkerr) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Opinion, per J. Benjamin: govinfo.gov/content/pkg/US… Dissent, per J. King: It was understandable to ask about a gun in this situation, so the question was reasonable. (see below)

Opinion, per J. Benjamin:  govinfo.gov/content/pkg/US… 

Dissent, per J. King: It was understandable to ask about a gun in this situation, so the question was reasonable. (see below)
Orin Kerr (@orinkerr) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Supreme Court summarily reverses the D.C. Court of Appeals in a Fourth Amendment case, concluding that there was reasonable suspicion to make a stop. supremecourt.gov/orders/courtor… #N

Supreme Court summarily reverses the D.C. Court of Appeals in a Fourth Amendment case, concluding that there was reasonable suspicion to make a stop. supremecourt.gov/orders/courtor… #N
Matthew Segal (@segalmr) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Today SCOTUS summarily: (1) reversed a D.C. Court of Appeals decision that had held the police lacked reasonable suspicion for a stop; and (2) vacated a Ninth Circuit decision that had denied qualified immunity in a case where a man died following "bodyweight pressure."

Today SCOTUS summarily:

(1) reversed a D.C. Court of Appeals decision that had held the police lacked reasonable suspicion for a stop; and

(2) vacated a Ninth Circuit decision that had denied qualified immunity in a case where a man died following "bodyweight pressure."