๐š๐Ÿถ๐™ณ๐™ธ๐š‰๐™ธ๐Ÿถ (@r0dizi0) 's Twitter Profile
๐š๐Ÿถ๐™ณ๐™ธ๐š‰๐™ธ๐Ÿถ

@r0dizi0

๐Ÿ•ณ๐Ÿ‡

ID: 19514192

linkhttps://bio.site/rodizio calendar_today26-01-2009 01:10:33

3,3K Tweet

2,2K Followers

3,3K Following

Katherine Boyle (@ktmboyle) 's Twitter Profile Photo

When evaluating a company, one of my favorite questions to ask is whether it has an aesthetic. We donโ€™t talk about aesthetics as the highest form of brand or story or a reflection of team cohesion, because investing on โ€œvibesโ€ or โ€œlookโ€ or โ€œmoodโ€ is very frowned upon. Even

Paul Graham (@paulg) 's Twitter Profile Photo

When a big new thing appears, we tend to think of it initially in terms of the old thing. For example, people thought of cars and trains as mechanized carriages initially, before starting to see them as their own thing. How are we doing this with AI?

When a big new thing appears, we tend to think of it initially in terms of the old thing. For example, people thought of cars and trains as mechanized carriages initially, before starting to see them as their own thing. How are we doing this with AI?
Cristรณbal Valenzuela (@c_valenzuelab) 's Twitter Profile Photo

It's clear to me that by 2027, we'll no longer maintain a meaningful distinction between content made "with AI" or "without AI." Generated videos will be assumed by default, much like how today when we speak about photography, we're implicitly referring to digital photography.