Here’s a 2×2 table showing what it’s like to live in a society depending on whether the populace and the State are tolerant or intolerant. The key moral: although we want both to be tolerant, an intolerant populace is far more dangerous than an intolerant State. A State’s

Update: Thanks to 米村幸城 Koki Yonemura for sharing details with figure legends confirming the findings: Fig. 2 shows IHC staining of metastatic breast cancer in skin (A: IDC & ECC) vs. primary tumor (B). H&E reveals morphology and as mentioned in the main post, nucleocapsid is

‘‘We had evidence that more children at that stage (June 2020) DIED from not attending hospital for other conditions than had died from COVID-19.’’

Kids aren't "germiest" deficits; they're adaptive learners, providing herd-level sterilizing buffers absent in over-sanitized adults. Study's high PCR detections simply confirm kids can breath where they are rarely index cases in household settings.

Even if for the best of intentions -disease prevention - it crosses a red line. We do not know enough even now to play god with the blueprint of human life. We constantly pursue agendas that doom mankind by undermining our genetic or epigenetic fitness

💣💥 Damning exposé by Talking Risk indicts NZ govt's vaccine juggernaut & blitzkrieg: secretive mandates at breakneck speed crushed public interests, jettisoned democratic safeguards like BORA & informed consent, while Parliament slept on accountability. nzdsos.com/2026/01/02/jod…

🎯

"In a world where establishment narratives dominate (and forensic analysis/cross-examination is lacking), this essay reaffirms that naturally-acquired immunity was never inferior—it was simply inconvenient for the agenda of mass vaccination." pungalog1.substack.com/p/the-superior…

Vaccine “efficacy” = pharma’s polished studio portrait. Real-world effectiveness = harsh, unedited snap that exposes filters. Old heuristic: "efficacy from well-conducted RCTs is usually a reliable upper bound for effectiveness" Not any more. Reality refuses to play along

When Paul Offit Admitted Natural Immunity Was Superior It's the epitome of policy-over-science. Downplaying natural immunity not because the evidence was lacking, but because nuance might undermine compliance and herd immunity goals. open.substack.com/pub/pungalog1/…

You cant conclude squat from unadjusted raw counts. But a slope of 0.88-0.90 with vaccinated deaths averaging ~80-85% of total during 2022-2023 peaks is consistent with vaccinated individuals making up ~85-90% of the at-risk population during those months -No obvious benefit.

"That arrogance and hubris, that prioritisation of short-term antibody control over the uncertain, multi-basin landscape biology actually inhabits, remains the defining failure of our COVID response."