In my opinion, it's ok for Anthropic to be a business and act like one. But this reinforces the need for open science and open-source AI to avoid concentration of power and control in the hands of a few of these businesses, otherwise we'll be in big trouble!

Saying that if we had 10 gigawatts for AI we can cure cancer is like saying that if we had a giant canvas we can paint a masterpiece.

how does one actually "inject AI"?

Stories > Statistics Hate the game... not the player. These CIO surveys catalyze downstream business when / if you rank people well. New folks ought to marry both. SemiAnalysis doing it.

An uncomfortable truth. Most orgs have shadow org charts, hence politics. Well run orgs = low political coefficients. High political coefficients hit a digitization wall as implementations are for fiefdoms, not the org. Agents will amplify this: megaphones also expose warts.

KPMG can't coattail on Grant's savings. But this will become common. 1) GT shares economics with tech firms that got them here (outcomes pricing). 2) GT claims majority value. Organizational innovation that intersects AI, profit & politics > "using AI".

Headscratcher. Talent ≠ Jobs. If you're truly in the business of returns, why not have and seed Associates to later be independent sponsors that buy their friends' / families businesses in the lower middle market - and have returns better than your current fund vintages?

Reads like R&D.

Buying WBD and Interpositive are mutually exclusive events. To understand M&A is to know that this timing negates causality. To understand AI is to know proprietary data from WBD IP ( and other content purchases ) would make interpositive *much more* useful.

Misleading headline + half truths. How should we to respond to false +ves / -ves? Super standard machine learning errors. We're not being realistic re: AI's limitations in the wild. You can't hold code accountable. You hold those behind it. That's the business of technology.

AGI was always a side quest. pcmag.com/news/openai-le…