Pat A.
@pataz1
Bigg It (n): Joanne. K. Rowling
ID:95328958
08-12-2009 02:03:19
138,2K Tweets
974 Followers
2,4K Following
Another place the #CassReview demands a control group for research showing positive benefits of PBs.
The Clarke was still operating in the 80s.
The #CassReview might as well just build their conclusions and recommendations on Blanchard (1988) if this is the quality of research it bases its recommendations on.
Having suggested that social media and online p*rn are a cause for GID/GD (showing no evidence for this claim), the #CassReview moves on assuming this has been proven to start the rest of the analysis.
The #CassReview doesn't seem to list who is on the Cass Review Team.
You can't check their credentials, expertise, or possible biases.
On that basis alone it would be rejected by every academic journal that exists.
For comparison, here's who worked on the WPATH
guidelines:
This is the where the #CassReview does one of its conceptual slights-of-hand to make an evidence-free assertion that essentially rapid-onset-dysphoria driven by social media is a contributing factor to GID
Hey Linda Yaccarino -
Is Elon Musk still claiming he's banning euphemisms for gen0c1de or was he just saying that to get in the good graces of the @adl?
Human Rights Campaign Apple IBM Ubisoft
You back a corrupt conman who has no interest in helping disadvantaged and poor people.
Trump is against everything you claim to stand for, Franklin Graham
A reminder:
In NO WORLD do adult clinics hand over adult patient data (without consent!) to a pediatric research team with no experience in the adult medical field they're researching.
#CassReview