Julia Serano(@JuliaSerano) 's Twitter Profileg
Julia Serano

@JuliaSerano

author of Whipping Girl, Sexed Up, Excluded, & 99 Erics. also at https://t.co/K1KsC56Tnp & https://t.co/WQlwU8hmYm. she/her

ID:363529473

linkhttp://www.juliaserano.com calendar_today28-08-2011 07:06:31

20,6K Tweets

37,8K Followers

787 Following

Julia Serano(@JuliaSerano) 's Twitter Profile Photo

the purpose of anti-trans legislation – whether targeting bathrooms, sports, gender-affirming care, books, drag, etc– is to remove trans ppl from the public sphere inasmuch as possible...

account_circle
Katy's Shit Cartoons(@KatysCartoons) 's Twitter Profile Photo

...but also it's important we never do any trials into 'Gender Critical therapy', because they will not show what we want

...but also it's important we never do any trials into 'Gender Critical therapy', because they will not show what we want
account_circle
Jackie Turner 🏳️‍⚧️(@JackieMaeTurner) 's Twitter Profile Photo

A great response from PATHA. More global experts calling out the flawed Cass Review.

'This review ignores the consensus of major medical bodies around the world and lacks relevance in an Aotearoa context'

patha.nz/News/13341582

account_circle
Eleri Angharad Pound (she/her)(@EleriAngharad) 's Twitter Profile Photo

This 'review' is a disgrace and clearly designed to achieve the conclusion they wanted by carefully discounting any inconvenient research that doesn't fit.

account_circle
Tyler Rose Clemons (she/her)(@TylerClemons) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Whenever anyone asks for a book on trans women or trans issues generally, this is the first book I recommend. It was also pivotal to my own coming out and transitioning.

account_circle
Jackie, the Stupidest Angel 💀 ✡️(@EntryLvlNut) 's Twitter Profile Photo

If you put forward a paper where they rejected 98% of the evidence that clearly disproved their stance for peer review and publication you wouldn't even get a written response beyond, 'Paper rejected without review, does not meet minimum standards.'

account_circle
Savannah 🇵🇸🏳️‍⚧️(@leftytgirl) 's Twitter Profile Photo

The Cass Review intentionally ignores the vast majority of studies showing that gender-affirming care for trans youth works, just so they could claim 'no evidence for gender-affirming care'

It's like a kid who steals your king every game and claims to be a chess grandmaster.

account_circle
Sou 🦕(@OneAndOnlySou) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Can't wait for Gender Critical Twitter to scream 'Trust the science!' about the Cass Review in the next weeks, ignoring the fact that the Cass Review only managed to get to its conclusion by ignoring 98% of the available evidence.
That's not an exaggeration.
98%.

account_circle
camiiiii(@Beatami_) 's Twitter Profile Photo

this is what an entire nations healthcare system is using to excuse medical discrimination btw. an “independent” “review” that excludes *98%* of all clinical studies on the topic and then comes to conclusions that *funnily enough* disagree with the *98% they removed*.

account_circle
Sandy 💜💙❤ 🏳️‍🌈 Ally She/Her 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿🇪🇸(@sullivansa1) 's Twitter Profile Photo

It's clear that those involved in cherry picked the research papers to fit the outcome they wanted then rejected all the others.

This wasn't 'independent', it was biased from the outset to drive a specific political agenda.

Question is: What to do about it ?

account_circle
Katelyn Burns(@transscribe) 's Twitter Profile Photo

The deeper irony is there’s never once been a study backing their conversion therapy protocol they push, much less a double blind study that they want us to do. It’s rank hypocrisy and one of the most obvious political medical scandals in history.

account_circle