By eliminating Washington’s long-term care insurance program, Initiative 2124 increases costs for working people, including nurses, teachers, and firefighters. We can’t afford I-2124.

We’re 7 weeks out and the countdown is on! Have you told your friends and family why you are voting NO on Initiative 2124 yet? #No2124 #WaElex

AARP Washington State President Jim Ko is voting No on I-2124, this November. The initiative will take away our public long-term care benefits, hurt family caregivers and remove support for working people. Learn more at aarp.org/NoOn2124 #no2124

In case you missed it – the Tri City Herald is calling for a NO vote on Initiative 2124! #No2124 #WaElex tri-cityherald.com/opinion/editor…

🔴 Op-Ed from MomsRising in the Tacoma News Tribune! “Defeating these harmful measures is critical to helping moms, families, and businesses succeed.” #No2124 #WaElex Read here ⬇️ thenewstribune.com/opinion/articl…

I-2124 will allow big long term care insurance companies to get even richer off of aging, sick or injured Washingtonians. Like with political efforts to privatize Social Security and Medicare, we need to say “no” to efforts to privatize long-term care.

“I-2124 will send us backwards, where only people of means can afford long-term care insurance, which charges women more than men.” -Cynthia Stewart, League of Women Voters #No2124 #WaElex LWV Washington

Judith is voting “No” on I-2124 because she knows it helps people be prepared for the things we often don’t prepare for. “Nobody wants to think about having a disastrous fall on the ski slope.” #No2124 #WaElex

Just 6 weeks to go! Have you signed up to volunteer and tell voters why Initiative 2124 is wrong for Washington? Visit our volunteer page ⬇️ noon2124.org/volunteer

I-2124 is bad for WA families. Vote NO on I-2124 because our loved ones can’t afford to lose their long-term care benefits.

Thank you Everett Herald Editorial Board for taking a position of NO on I-2124. As stated in the editorial, I believe I2124 would devastate patients & families needing long term care, & drive up the cost of healthcare for everyone. No On I-2124 (WA) WSNA heraldnet.com/opinion/editor…

🔴 New endorsement! The Everett Herald says vote NO on Initiative 2124. "As with other initiatives this election, voters are offered a false economic choice, a chance to save a little money now at likely greater cost later." #WaElex #No2124 heraldnet.com/opinion/editor…

Vote No on I-2124. Initiative 2124 will hurt working women – the majority of family caregivers – who often leave their jobs or scale back their hours to care for older loved ones. Learn more at aarp.org/NoOn2124 #no2124

“If you’ve never had to deal with those kinds of costs before, they will probably be extraordinarily surprising.” Cade from Bellingham knows how expensive long-term care can be – that’s why he’s voting No on Initiative 2124. #No2124 #WaElex

Washington’s long-term care insurance program is a safety net, like Social Security or Medicare, set up to allow seniors, and disabled or severely ill adults, to live with dignity and stability. It’s worth protecting. Vote No on I-2124. #No2124 #WaElex

It’s tough to think about the day when we’ll need long-term care. But the fact is, one day, most of us will need help with daily living activities, and the vast majority of us don't have a way to pay for support like home care, home modifications, or residential care.

From nonprofits to elected leaders to business owners, the list of leaders who oppose Initiative 2124 is long, and it keeps getting longer! See all the No endorsers here ⬇️ noon2124.org/who-opposes-i-…

Our new ad, “Barely Remember” is live! Kim had surgery as a child, and now decades later, private long-term care insurance is denying her coverage because of a “preexisting condition.” Watch ⬇️⬇️⬇️

⏰️ 5 weeks to go! That’s just 5 weeks more to tell voters why Initiative 2124 is wrong for Washington – have you volunteered yet? Sign up here ⬇️ noon2124.org/volunteer