In his presser Tocchet mentioned the league had a couple things to look at including a Hyman cross check. Has to be this one below. I’m told Zadorov needed stitches to close up a cut on his face. #canucks

Woz 😂 I bet you think this wasn't a dive when it was an obvious bellyflop

Guys, cmon.

The right to freedom of speech is central because it's the right by which you defend all the other rights.

BREAKING NOW: Trump announces monumental new plan to eliminate ALL TAXES ON OVERTIME pay. "The people who work overtime are among the hardest working citizens in our country -- When you pass 40 hours a week, your overtime hours will be tax free."

A mob of black teens attacked 3 old white men in Milwaukee this week. 0 national outrage.

x.com/i/article/1856…

Hold up… I’m just trying to follow the puck here. For years, we were told that the carbon tax put more money back into the pockets of 80% of Canadians. Now, Prime Minister Carney is telling me that in order to put more money back into my pocket, he must kill the carbon tax. Just

Remember when Liberal would say that if you didn’t accept the carbon tax, you hated the planet?

Nearly 400 academics signed a letter last year supporting the carbon tax—despite multiple inaccuracies. They claimed it wouldn’t fuel inflation (it does), that most Canadians get more back than they pay (they don’t when factoring supply chain costs), and that it won’t hurt

The only time Netflix race swaps a black person for a white person and it’s a murderer

Pierre Poilievre blasts "globalist" Mark Carney for wanting to nearly triple Canada's population though mass immigration Says that uncontrolled levels of mass immigration is destroying the working class in Canada

Initial comment: stance is that being turned off by « normal body hair » is problematic. Why doesnt this apply to height? (You dont answer for about 10 replies because you know where this is going)

Then, you say body shaming is criticizing things you cant control…. So, like height? Then I asked you so is the preference the problem, or communicating it the problem? You didnt answer

Then, you provide an answer finally, but provide no rationale for why your answer makes sense. What your saying is equivalent to saying that any male sexual standard is oppressive therefore wrong, but female ones are not oppressive therefore not wrong. Its nonsense

You said womens preferences arent backed by oppression. Inferring that male preferences are. You happy?

Every Canadian need to watch this video before heading to the voting booth on election night!

How does this make you feel?