In 2024, 64% of all renewable energy in Denmark was biomasse/woodpellets. Yes we chop down trees or import wood and burn it and call it renewable energy. The gaslighting of the century. And the renewable fanbois either dont know or just ignore this fact.🤷‍♂️🙄

Am Ostersonntag (05.04.2026) regelten die Franzosen ihre AKW-Flotte um bis zu 15 GW runter (Bild 1), um deutschen Überschuss-Solarstrom aufnehmen zu können (Bild 2). Natürlich zu negativen Preisen (Bild 3). Das sind keine rechten Verschwörungstheorien - das lässt sich alles

There is no energy transition to renewables "Rather than replacing fossil fuels, renewables are adding to the overall energy mix" Energy Institute Statistical Review 2025 energyinst.org/statistical-re… energyinst.org/exploring-ener… Threads&refs: x.com/BjornLomborg/s…

Konstantin Kisin watched the BBC’s tech editor interview Elon Musk and came away stunned. Not because of the tough questions — but because the interviewer ran out of questions. Kisin asked the obvious: How do you run out of questions when you’re sitting across from the guy who

Es ist ja nicht so, daß wir keinen Atomstrom mehr hätten. Der kommt jetzt halt nur aus Frankreich.

Renewables myths busted 1. 'Norway has 100% renewable energy' No. It doesn't. It gets a LOT of electricity from hydropower. But much of its overall energy comes still from fossil fuels. And very little from 'renewable' wind and solar Hydro is only an option in mountainous

More trade has real costs, but the benefits are vastly greater. For rich countries, the benefits outweigh costs 7x. For the world's poorer half, benefits are an astounding 95x higher. Peer-reviewed #SDGs research published by Cambridge University Press: cambridge.org/core/journals/…

John Raymond Hanger  Oh no, what will the fossil fuel Industry do now 🤷‍♂️🤣

Torsten Gejl

The biggest lie in energy policy: “Fossil fuels are heavily subsidized.” Reality👇 Solar: $68/MWh Wind: $19/MWh Everything else: ~$1–2/MWh If wind and solar were actually cheaper… They wouldn’t need 10–50x more subsidies to survive. Because without subsidies… Renewables

A century of US climate records reveals a truth the 'narrative' ignores: no sustained crisis, but a biological boom. NASA satellite studies confirm a global greening, fueled by the very CO₂ the UN has 'weaponised' to justify its evolution from peacemaker to global financier.

Recent climate alarmist nonsense about an AMOC collapse is standard operating procedure whenever there are no hurricanes or tornadoes to scream about. It's an addiction to alarmism and doom & gloom prophesies -- much like those who love watching scary movies - just for fun.

The top 2.5 metres of the world's oceans hold as much heat energy as the entire atmosphere above it. The oceans are the world's thermal powerhouse and it takes a massive amount of energy to nudge its temperature even a fraction of a degree. It's vast heat capacity is the key.

To understand why CO₂ levels rise and fall over millennia, look at a glass of sparkling water. When it’s cold, it stays fizzy. When it warms up, it goes flat as the CO₂ escapes into the air. The Earth’s oceans work exactly the same way. This is the principle of a solubility

This number increases every day. There is zero evidence linking 0.04% Co2 in the atmosphere to increased temperatures.

Dr. Richard Lindzen, Professor Emeritus of Atmospheric Science at MIT, says global warming fear isn't driven by data, but by money and control. He recently told the Daily Mail that politicians saw climate policy as a multi-trillion dollar opportunity to reshape industries, to

Andrew Neil Beta_Beaker This is bullshit. Electricity is not free. We still pay tarifs to the danish government no matter how low the electricity price drops.

"Vind har overtaget fra kul" Nej. Biomasse har overtaget fra kul. Altså at brænde skove af med dertilhørende partikelforurening og instant udledning af CO2. Biomasse er tilgengæld styrbart og derfor det eneste som kan overtage fra kul, medmindre...

Today is 40 years ago Chernobyl reactor 4 melted down. What very few people dont know, is that the 3 other reactors on the Chernobyl plant remained in operation, and the last reactor closed in year 2000. So no, the area was not an uninhabited barren wasteland.