It's a post-consent world. What’s coming is chronic low-grade immune disruption across the population. What the morlocks gain is a quieter, more compliant population that’s primed to need the system that weakened them in the first place.

Yes Breadman. Once crypto is formally accepted for mortgages, taxes, or loan underwriting, it won’t be your Bitcoin that qualifies. Instead, it will be Bitcoin that passes through regulated custody, risk scoring and KYC compliance checkpoints.

Rewriting Knots from scratch is about severing the last point of dependence on Core. As long as Knots is a fork of Core, they control the upstream repo logic, set the rhythm of upgrades and can frame everything else as a derivative or deviation. Luke Dashjr

Support BTC Sessions. He’s the real deal.

There is a millennia-old system in place which pre-dates fiat. It is rooted in legal illusion and occult authority. Fiat could go away tomorrow but if that system persists, Sauron still returns.

Outstanding summary. These are the rare gems that make Twitter worthwhile.

You’re right. It’s the start of Bitcoin War 2 and most are blissfully unaware. The war for sovereign BTC will be won and lost by the marginal few % who know and care.

There is no 5 year old kid explanation. ETF inflows are offset by silent sell pressure (whales, miners, VCs) ETFs buy OTC not spot Perps suppress via leverage Wash trades fake demand TPTB need slow bleed-in, not breakouts

Even at a slowing pace, Knots will hit ~25% of Bitcoin nodes by October. That’s enough to fracture relay consensus and Core knows it. Expect a soft spam fix from Core before then. They’ll call their retreat ‘leadership’.

Mr Cash, hello. Relay consensus exists. Nodes must agree on what gets forwarded or nothing propagates. This isn’t about enforcing policy top-down. It’s about signaling a credible fork. Core doesn’t wait for 90% or 50% or 30%. They react before it gets there.

The fork is already happening. Bitcoin War 2- the Node War- is not just about code; it's about control. This Node War is a fracture of civilizational importance. The challenge is if we will retain sovereign BTC. Or if all your stack will answer to the Monopoly Man.

That graphic doesn’t show decentralization. It shows gatekeeping.

A sharp point not being discussed enough.

Getting pumped with nanotech in beautiful Yelm, Washington after just getting rid of it. #chemtrail

internationalman.com/articles/the-h…

More importantly, what is the contingency plan for if/when "Satoshi's" coims move? This is an example of adversarial anticipation. Movement doesn’t prove identity, but it forces a reset of narrative, trust, and control.

Bitcoin Soft Forks, Hard Forks

Bitcoin Core v30 enabled data injection that can criminalize node operators A soft fork just filters; it doesn’t reject blocks Core already accepts Only a hard fork locks the door This isn’t a bug. It’s the most serious attack Bitcoin has ever faced Defend it or lose it

A hard fork will split the chain and cause real damage But it’s the only way to undo Core’s OP_RETURN policy This isn’t a debate over dev preferences; it’s a killshot at node sovereignty Most don’t see it yet. If we flinch now, sovereign Bitcoin is finished and doesn’t know it

Matthew R. Kratter The kill shot is already here It went under the rug due to its technical nature, a lack of adversarial anticipation in the community and the obvious corruption of Core Now is not the time to play existential Twister to preserve optics