Current working title of this paper draft: "Travis was right, Mike was wrong."

This is short, and probably requires more work to convince most syntacticians. But it's a novel approach to clitic doubling, so there's that. (bc we definitely need theory #4,562 about clitic doubling, right?) lingbuzz.net/lingbuzz/005551

As a small distraction from insurrection, here’s something way too long to actually read. Students ask me really good questions all the time, and this is my attempt to answer some of them. It’s mildly heretical but that will make it interesting, right?lingbuzz.net/lingbuzz/005671

Posting for the syntacticians who may find this useful, for themselves or for their students. This is what I needed three years ago but didn't exist, so a student helped me learn what we needed and then we wrote up what we learned. overleaf.com/latex/template…

Apologies for the small sample size. I could only do a few tests of how well my improvements worked because I have limited access to GPT-4. You can only ask it 8 questions per hour! If somebody at OpenAI wants to give me access to the GPT-4 API, I'd love to be able to do more!