Take it from an attorney, you don’t have to be smart to be an attorney - far from it. You just have to pass law school & pass a test. & law schools won’t fail you - it would mean less $ in their pockets. Also, everything about law school and the practice of law is centered on /1

/2 learning & following established rules and procedures. Half of what you do is spotting issues & knowing what canned argument, form, statute, or common law principle to apply. There is almost zero need for creativity. In other words, not only is intelligence not a requirement

/3 being smart & creative are often perceived in the legal community as impediments to doing most aspects of your job. My point: consider Mark Levin, who by all indications is a dullard, wholly incapable of any independent thought.

/4 I used to watch Levin’s guest appearances on Glenn Beck & Sean Hannity back before I was red-pilled. Levin never offered any insight other than what was the standard GOP party line, the Fox News worldview, if you will, that you would see regurgitated & repeated by every

/5 talking head on every “fair & balanced” segment in the formula FN invented: news blurb followed by “here are [insert names of 2 liberal & conservative blowhards]” who’d then bloviate a few min, in an aggressive tone, about the latest party talking points on a topic.

/6 You’d listen to the segment &, 5-10’min later, wish you could have that lost time of your life back. Ditto with Levin’s books. At the end of my Glenn Beck fan days, I picked up discounted copy of Levin’s “The Liberty Amendments” because I read “liberty” on the cover & like

/7 learning about the Constitution. Yet 1/2 of the amendments offered were typical GOP platform planks (photo ID to vote, Cong. term limits, balanced budget, etc), but the others were straight from TR’s Progressive Party platform, Wilson & FDR. Limits on judicial review? Term

/7 limits for judges? Allowing states to amend the Const by bypassing Congress? Repealing the 17th Amendment? Allowing states to overturn federal laws with a 2/3 vote? Thats all early 1900s progressivism & William Jennings Bryant populism. It’s nothing new & it failed back then

8 / for good reasons. The worst part isn’t the plagiarism of tired ides, though. No, it’s the fact that Levin appears to have Trump’s ear when it comes to constitutional ideas. So the idiocy we’ve seen, tariffs, credit card rate caps, limiting the number of homes an entity owns,

/9 removing limits on presidential power, election fraud hyperbole, “judicial activism,” etc, derives from 2 sources: 1. Trump waking up in the morning, looking in the mirror, & asking himself “what can I take a sledgehammer to today?; and 2. The vast array of unimaginative

10/ unqualified, yes-men who form this President’s administration & circle of advisors (to be fair, there are also intelligent, shady, self-enriching yes-men in that same circle) who feed Trump’s head with ill-thought out ideas & trite, but failed policies, & Levin is one

11/seems to most admire, particularly, b/c of the former’s blind loyalty to the latter. Trump’s ignorance coupled w/his sociopathy, fomented by horrible advice from those Phillistine sycophants, all reverberating in an echo chamber is a recipe for horror on a massive scale.

“Christians” in my feed this morning: Not Robert Mueller or his family but “they” mocked Charlie Kirk’s death, therefore, Trump gets to dance on Bob Mueller’s grave. Also, “Mueller tried to ruin Trump’s life based on bs charges.” Cool, now do disadvantaged, minority defendants

The first time I abandoned a girlfriend in the mountains was an accident. We had an argument about something trivial, and she decided to go off on her own for a bit to cool down. I insisted she stick to the trail, but she said she didn’t need me mansplaining how to find her way

My questions: 1. Did China do anything that Israel did not also do? 2. Is this a comment one should expect from a purportedly unbiased public opinion polling agency?

Very Christian of him