Marek Kwiek / Social Stratification in Science (@marek_kwiek) 's Twitter Profile
Marek Kwiek / Social Stratification in Science

@marek_kwiek

Quantitative Science Studies | Global Academic Profession | Full Professor | UNESCO Chair | Academia Europaea | 'Changing European Academics' (Routledge 2019)

ID: 831815461956419584

linkhttps://ias.amu.edu.pl/director/ calendar_today15-02-2017 10:40:35

7,7K Tweet

9,9K Takipçi

5,5K Takip Edilen

Marek Kwiek / Social Stratification in Science (@marek_kwiek) 's Twitter Profile Photo

arxiv.org/abs/2411.00008 !!! Submitted on 17 Oct 2024 !!! "Growth of #Science and Women: #Methodological Challenges of Using #Structured Big Data". #Minerva, what a mistake & #waste of my time! 7 months, not a single first review? For my paper #preselected year ago for a

Gavin Moodie (@gavinmoodie) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Marek Kwiek / Social Stratification in Science Agree it is v annoying to get no review 7 months after submission. We know too well journals' difficulties in getting good peer reviews. But the start of the solution is surely to manage journals & their editorship efficiently, not to coast along with this sort of sloppiness.

Marek Kwiek / Social Stratification in Science (@marek_kwiek) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Exactly! I am a 'leading scholar, Stanford list 2%, MAE etc. Now think of co-author Lukasz Szymula, 28. For him, 2 years... Look at #Minerva Scopus journal percentile ranks. A fall. My young collaborators would never go below 95th percentile. #Minerva is 80, substandard.

Exactly! I am a 'leading scholar, Stanford list 2%, MAE etc.

Now think of co-author <a href="/lukasz_szymula/">Lukasz Szymula</a>, 28. For him, 2 years...

Look at #Minerva  Scopus journal percentile  ranks. 

A fall. My young collaborators would never go below 95th percentile. #Minerva is 80, substandard.
Marek Kwiek / Social Stratification in Science (@marek_kwiek) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Look, #Minerva as you show below, provides IF. But does not show, much more useful and fair in any comparion, its 80th #Scopus journal #percentile rank. Top journals today are in the 95-99 perentile range... The upper 5% max, never the upper... 20%. Cristal clear to me why.

Look, #Minerva as you show below, provides IF.

But does not show, much more useful and fair in any comparion, its 80th #Scopus journal #percentile rank. Top journals today are in the 95-99 perentile range... The upper 5% max, never the upper... 20%. Cristal clear to me why.
Marek Kwiek / Social Stratification in Science (@marek_kwiek) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Yes! #Minerva provides IF. But does not show, much more #useful #fair in any comparion, its 80th #Scopus journal #percentile rank. #Top journals today tend to be in the 95-99 pecrentile range The upper 5% max, never the upper... 20%. Clear to me why now. #Inefficiency.

Yes! #Minerva provides IF.

But does not show, much more #useful #fair in any comparion, its 80th #Scopus journal #percentile rank. 

#Top journals today tend to be in the 95-99 pecrentile range

The upper 5% max, never the upper... 20%. Clear to me why now. #Inefficiency.
Marek Kwiek / Social Stratification in Science (@marek_kwiek) 's Twitter Profile Photo

#Minerva provides IF. But does not show, much more #useful #fair in any comparion, its 80th #Scopus journal #percentile rank. #Top journals today tend to be in the 95-99 pecrentile range The upper 5% max, never the upper... 20%. Clear to me why now.

#Minerva provides IF.

But does not show, much more #useful #fair in any comparion, its 80th #Scopus journal #percentile rank. 

#Top journals today tend to be in the 95-99 pecrentile range

The upper 5% max, never the upper... 20%. Clear to me why now.
Marek Kwiek / Social Stratification in Science (@marek_kwiek) 's Twitter Profile Photo

By Luke Drury, excellent! The history of the preprint, its advantages and potential disadvantages, and some recommendations for how the growing acceptance of preprint posting should be handled within academia. The normalization of preprints council.science/publications/n…

Gavin Moodie (@gavinmoodie) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Marek Kwiek / Social Stratification in Science 'Finally, and crucially, we need sustained long-term investment by funders and research performing organizations in community-governed not-for-profit repositories such as arXiv, Zenodo and the exemplary Latin American La Referencia. . . .' page 10

Marek Kwiek / Social Stratification in Science (@marek_kwiek) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Basically, there is no point! Agreed! Therefore I felt it was #unfair, #Minerva journal. Hence the whole 1- day long #manuscript #witdrawal decision and sending the ms. somewhere else. Nothing #personal, I do not even know anyone there. No #hard feelings. Still, a lesson.

Marek Kwiek / Social Stratification in Science (@marek_kwiek) 's Twitter Profile Photo

So, a bit of promo out of this #Minerva journal story. The ms. sits happily on #preprint server arxiv. Wow, our Europe vs. the USA comparative #visualizations in Business Intelligence #Tableau incredible! I hope we will have it in Nature' s HSSC faster (top 1% of journals).