Unrolled thread from Richard H. Ebright threadreaderapp.com/thread/1785766… Select Committee Covid Origins

Bryce Nickels Bryce Nickels·16h so... he won't take the 5th17105
Richard H. Ebright @R_H_EbrightThat is the correct inference.
TRUE!

This is a major development: The Democrats opening statements indicate they will support debarment of EcoHealth Alliance based on repeated violations of the terms of their grants and contracts.

Here we go...

Gostin and other enablers of the 'pandemic prediction' grift pose an immense danger to global public health.

Perhaps the 'One Health' agenda needs an addition: Exclude these dangerous liars from decision-making bodies.

Thread by Katherine Eban 'thank you!' threadreaderapp.com/thread/1785639…
and thank you, also, to Richard H. Ebright Bryce Nickels & the crew @ #DRASTIC

Katherine Eban Good thread summarising Baric’s insights for those who don’t have time to read the Vanity Fair article.

Katherine Eban has been great throughout this mess.

Here, Baric (the world’s foremost coronavirologist) tips a bucket on Daszak, Wuhan Institute Virology, market origin, Worobey, Pekar …

Great summary of the state of play after Daszaks testimony before Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic yesterday.

EcoHealth is debarred from any further government funding and bipartisan support for Department of Justice investigation

AdrianGibbs1934 Hon Prof Colin D Butler Dog's Breakfast John Johnston

Katherine Eban Another compilation of Baric’s greatest hits. H/t Richard H. Ebright

Science Nerd Richard H. Ebright Paul D. Thacker Natasha Loder 🐋 they don't care about tone-- they claim to care when they wish to deplatform the proposals of someone they disagree with and/or dislike ...
its much easier to offer an opinion on tone than it is to offer an opinion on substance

omg Dr. F!

Richard H. Ebright Paul D. Thacker Ok- so maybe it was the tone in this letter from 758 scientists? Do you think in retrospect, if you would have been more polite, Fauci would have reversed course? Perhaps you and the other 757 scientists that signed this letter should reflect, no? nytimes.com/2005/03/01/pol…

Bryce Nickels The focus of the discussion was the Baric-Shi project that constructed novel chimeric coronaviruses that combine the spike gene of one SARS-like coronavirus with the rest of the genetic information of another SARS-like coronavirus.

See nature.com/articles/natur….

Richard H. Ebright Can you give more details about the story about your comments after Baric's talk at Chatham House? What year was this? Was the description of your comments on the podcast accurate? Was their yelling, screaming?? Chairs thrown?

Bryce Nickels November 2015. Baric and I were invited discussants at a Royal Society/National Academies meeting on synthetic biology, gain of function, and options for regulation. The discussion was heated (but no yelling or screaming). Beyond this, the Chatham House Rule limits comment.

Outstanding podcast on the coronavirus gain-of-function research in Wuhan that likely caused the COVID-19 pandemic.

Highly recommended.

If you can listen to just one podcast on the origin of COVID-19, make it this one.

Part 2 of the podcast also is highly informative (and also is highly recommended).

twitter.com/Arbuthnott/sta…

House Select Subcommittee Chair Brad Wenstrup:
'We've come to the conclusion in a bipartisan fashion that….Daszak and EcoHealth Alliance should no longer receive one penny for any type of research'

nationalreview.com/news/should-no…

news-medical.net/news/20240429/… ??
Angela Reiersen, MD, MPE Roger Seheult, MD Dr Murphy WeightLoss

oh cr*p!!