Does your coding agent run on Claude Sonnet 4.6? Costing you $3.00 per million input tokens and $15.00 per million output? MiniMax M2.5 on Chutes costs just $0.19 input and $1.15 output all while running inside a secure and private TEE. M2.5 scores 80.2% on SWE-Bench Verified

Subnet 3. 70+ distributed nodes. One training run. The model is Covenant-72B. The protocol is Templar.

Bittensor obviously has flaws: -few issues with the incentive mechanism -overal subnet quality can be better -multi consensus could open up more use cases That being said, the quality is increasing at a rapid pace, many people from frontier labs and so on starting to build and

Chutes is and always will be a bittensor project, chutes is bittensor, and bittensor is chutes 🫶 Reminder too that chutes team operates as a group of independent corporations with no CEO, and our funds are locked into a smart contract which pays our staking rewards to fund the

We think you should know exactly who's shipping your inference. No CEO. No board. No single person who can pull the plug. Ten contributors, a smart contract, and 100B+ tokens processed daily. Jon Durbin, Backend Florian S (Florian), Backend + Research Kyle Widmann,

GEMMA 4 26B A4B IS NOW RUNNING ON A MACBOOK PRO M5 MAX IN 100% NATIVE SWIFT. And pushing over 100 tok/s with Apple’s MLX makes local AI on Mac look way more serious.

Other networks have "rug pulls" every day. They ignore this problem. TradFi startups solved this with vesting cliffs. Introducing Bittensor "Conviction" - locked stake so token holders can cryptographically verify an owner's long-term commitment. Trust proven mathematically.

We have burned ~$500,000 worth of our owner-controlled $SN51 tokens within the last month and will continue to burn tokens at this rate. $500,000 burned per month that could otherwise be in our pockets. revenue bought back + burned. no extra wasted emissions going to the