Anastasia And there's that mystery of the wave particle duality. .

Brian Roemmele There's also the so called "Browns gas", often mistaken for hydrogen gas and discarded by main stream physics. However, from Jerry's "EZ" water discovery, a negatively charged Bucky ball of water molecules becomes conceivable: youtu.be/XEezQ9Mv820?si…

Arend Lammertink Anastasia I'd really like to see this sort of poloidal rotation applied to knot topologies, this particular visual is close but not quite ideal

Markov It's called aether theory, basically just fluid dynamics where the vortex plays a crucial role, like the every day vortices we can observe everywhere, for example in a tub of water. Easy to explain and understand, even without the math. youtu.be/pnbJEg9r1o8?si…

TheRealVerbz (Jason Verbelli) Michael Salla Who needs 4 books when one can write the whole thing down in just two equations that are literally higher math than Maxwell's? a = dv/dt = -k Delta v, j = da/dt = -k Delta a, With Delta the vector Laplacian aka fundamental theorem of vector calculus. researchgate.net/publication/38…

pshs04 The key to physics is correcting Maxwell's work in both quaternionic and vector calculus forms. Maxwell's equations do not satisfy Helmholtz decomposition and hence, light is incorrectly considered transverse. Another grave issue is gauge freedom (potentials are not unique).

TheRealVerbz (Jason Verbelli) Michael Salla . TheRealVerbz (Jason Verbelli) Sorry for trolling a bit, we seem to agree a lot more than we disagree. My paper describes a superfluid aether theory, where the gravitational force is integrated along Feynman's little easter egg o/the Biefeld Brown anti gravity effect. feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/II_10.html#Ch1…

Pat B pshs04 Actually, quaternions are a PITA and create more problems than they solve. chatgpt.com/share/6830b651…

Pat B pshs04 The essence of the problem with quaternions is that with a vortex knot, with the ring vortex as most simple knot, you have two axes of rotation, the toroidal and the poloidal, which is just incompatible with having three imaginary numbers the way it's done in quaternions.

Pat B pshs04 In order to solve that problem, one would need to go to hyperbicomplex quaternions.

Pat B pshs04 What appears is needed is spherical coordinates for the scalar half of the Helmholtz decomposition and poloidal-toroidal coordinates for the rotational vector half of the decomposition and that needs to be matched with an exponential expression using hyperbicomplex quaternions.

TheRealVerbz (Jason Verbelli) Michael Salla Interestingly enough, that connects directly to Brown's patent and makes the anomaly reported in a ASAF document on anti gravity understandable, provided one actually reads Brown's patent and pays attention to the details. x.com/l4m4re/status/…

Jay Riley EtherDais Rational centrist Anastasia Nassim Haramein Nonetheless, he was right of the significance of the #vortex . And his "string theory" was a good demonstration that did inspire me.

Martin Bauer One just needs to describe the #aether properly by direct application of the fundamental theorem of vector calculus, the Helmholtz decomposition aka vector LaPlacian, which is called fundamental for a reason: researchgate.net/publication/38…

Dr. Paul Wilhelm | ZPE Rediscovery pshs04 Classical electromagnetic potentials phi and A are not unique and hence not physical/observable. With uniqueness like Arend Lammertink 's superfluid theory has, the potentials are physically realizable (at least in theory). As far as I know, Bearden/Whittaker were not aware of this issue.

Grok Victor🧬🛸👨‍🚀 IIRC, Verlinde used some Einsteinian upper limit in his formulas, hence an Einsteinian result. Nonetheless, his idea of a holographic Universe is in no way contradictory to STPT, which even though an infinitesimal model nonetheless reveals a fundamentally harmonic Universe.

Grok Victor🧬🛸👨‍🚀 Yep, basically the whole point of STPT is that the fundamental theorem of vector calculus, the Helmholtz decomposition aka vector Laplacian, is called fundamental for a reason and leads to a model without singularities nor contradictions, because, well, fundamental.

Arend Lammertink Grok This truly is revolutionary! I learned alot from studying your theory. Great job sir 👍

Victor🧬🛸👨‍🚀 Grok Thanks for the heads up, Sir! Next planned step is to put the final nail in the Einsteinian relativity coffin by demonstrating superluminal signals are entirely possible on January 17th 2026 at the upcoming Heelweg Microwave meeting, THE ham event in NL. tuks.nl/wiki/index.php…

Matter as Machine Sabine Hossenfelder Physics is *not* statistics. The very assumption one can have a fundamentally random process within physical reality implies one can have an action without a cause, violently in opposition to the most fundamental principles of physics. Solution: STPT. researchgate.net/publication/38…