Kwat Medetgul-Ernar 🩸 (@kwatmdphd) 's Twitter Profile
Kwat Medetgul-Ernar 🩸

@kwatmdphd

Bioinformatician 🧬
MD-PhD candidate at Stanford 🩺
Founder 🔥

ID: 122524696

linkhttps://KwatMDPhD.com calendar_today13-03-2010 01:01:07

1,1K Tweet

1,1K Takipçi

2,2K Takip Edilen

Kwat Medetgul-Ernar 🩸 (@kwatmdphd) 's Twitter Profile Photo

There should be a ratio of: characters typed on X to the number of patients served. Do this for individuals and institutions. Who’s gonna score the highest? Lowest?

The American Association of Immunologists (AAI) (@immunologyaai) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Gain access to the recorded content from IMMUNOLOGY2025™, AAI's record-breaking annual meeting! We recognize that staying current with cutting-edge research is crucial to your professional growth. Discover more from #IMMUNOLOGY2025™: ow.ly/mKCr50Wj6yL.

Gain access to the recorded content from IMMUNOLOGY2025™, AAI's record-breaking annual meeting! We recognize that staying current with cutting-edge research is crucial to your professional growth. Discover more from #IMMUNOLOGY2025™: ow.ly/mKCr50Wj6yL.
Balaji (@balajis) 's Twitter Profile Photo

0% AI is slow. But 100% AI is slop. So the optimal amount of AI is actually between 0-100%. The exact figure varies by situation, but just the idea that 0% and 100% are both suboptimal is useful. It's the Laffer Curve, but for AI.

0% AI is slow.
But 100% AI is slop.

So the optimal amount of AI is actually between 0-100%. The exact figure varies by situation, but just the idea that 0% and 100% are both suboptimal is useful.

It's the Laffer Curve, but for AI.