“ name ONE time you were right ”

“Don’t tell Kori or Vic that I’m doing your homework, Kon.”

i gotta find me a girlfriend

“ cause you’re fighting for something you can’t win. ”

oh please —.

when are you NOT trynna prove something ?

“ hey , 𝓒𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓲𝓮 𝓢𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓼𝓶𝓪𝓻𝓴.. wanna get something to eat ? ”

we’re excluding this time.

that’s not true ! change me back !

/ actually , if you look closely you will see that thag the archives will show every single DM up until the the archive was generated ( here is the proof which is september 12th ). meaning that even if i had deleted it one minute before the archive was generated , it ——

—— would have still appeared. you still haven’t provided proof that i our so called conversation exists where i have shown , that it doesn’t

/ nah this getting funny asf 😂😂 first of all , you asked for what creditable proof i have provided to show that even in archives our chat doesn’t exist ( link below ) x.com/symbolicforhop…

let’s go to the thread and then so called screenshots and proof you provided. me and several people have asked you to provide further proof that the statements and conversation shown below did actually happen && you provided nothing. and we have been asking ——

—— since the thread came out for video or even more proof it occurred. i myself have provided my own proof ( video and screenshots ) that our chat , that entire dm never occurred ( linked below ) x.com/godamongstman/…

|| I know some of you believe the victim and never look at the accused, especially if it's a woman accusing. But man, when an evidence against accusations is presented, actually read because this ain't the first time someone lied about their accusations against someone

|| Other than that? It's called being an adult.

|| And until evidence is shown that proves this counter evidence wrong, I'm not believing shit. There were a lot of sus things in their ss too. 1) Why's the first, cropped paragraph blank? You'd think if you're exposing someone, you'll show everything they sent. 2) They posted-

--- the screenshots on a browser. ???? Why?? 3) They're a newly flipped account... that supposedly had zero interactions and no one can access their DMs if you're not mutuals. 4) She could have had posted several proofs that the dms were indeed there by accessing their own ---

--- archives and showing us that it was THERE. Twitter keeps your DMs even if you deleted them. The claim that you can delete dms in archives is false because it's on read-only. But she only keeps pointing fingers saying she posted all evidence. She doesn't even have proof ---

--- if that was their screenshot and there was no date stamp. So until she shows something that proves BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT that what she said happened actually happened, she's sus.