Kristoffer Nilsson (@krillenil) 's Twitter Profile
Kristoffer Nilsson

@krillenil

Customer Advisor within Architecture @SASSoftware. Opinions are my own.

ID: 3936780634

calendar_today12-10-2015 11:39:29

104 Tweet

100 Followers

132 Following

SAS Institute Nordic (@sas_nordic) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Please meet our valuable sponsors of the SAS Nordic Hackathon 2019 - Intel Intel, Esri Sverige Esri Sverige and Microsoft Azure Microsoft Azure #HackInSAS #hackathon 2.sas.com/6017EMrYF

Please meet our valuable sponsors of the SAS Nordic Hackathon 2019 - Intel <a href="/Intel/">Intel</a>, Esri Sverige <a href="/esrisverige/">Esri Sverige</a> and Microsoft Azure <a href="/azure/">Microsoft Azure</a>  #HackInSAS #hackathon 2.sas.com/6017EMrYF
Kristoffer Nilsson (@krillenil) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Innan jul träffade jag Mattias Strandberg Mattias Strandberg på @dagensanalys. Kul att se hur han fick ihop mina lätt röriga tankar kring #analytics och #AI :) dagensanalys.se/2019/01/sas-in…

Kristoffer Nilsson (@krillenil) 's Twitter Profile Photo

A1: In the industries where it is possible to work from home, it has forced companies to see which parts of work can be done just as well (or better digitally), but also where the physical interaction really is needed or makes the work way more productive. #saschat @CoreCompete

Kristoffer Nilsson (@krillenil) 's Twitter Profile Photo

A1: It has also shown the need, not only for digital services to be able to work from everywhere, but also the agility to be able to adapt, without really knowing how the future looks like. #saschat @CoreCompete

Kristoffer Nilsson (@krillenil) 's Twitter Profile Photo

A2: Businesses expect their analytics environment to be adaptable for use cases not known today. Accessible by everyone that could generate value with analytics. And reliable to allow the analytics environment to be an a integral part of the business. #saschat @CoreCompete

Kristoffer Nilsson (@krillenil) 's Twitter Profile Photo

A3: To be flexible, the analytics environment needs to be scalabe, hence it puts requirement to scale up/down the environment depending on load/user requirements, and also to be able to easily spin up new environments when needed. #saschat @CoreCompete

Kristoffer Nilsson (@krillenil) 's Twitter Profile Photo

A3: Since analytics should follow the data it also opens up for more requirement regarding cloud/hybrid architectures, allowing for data residing in anything ranging from on premise mainframes to cloud data lakes. #saschat @CoreCompete

Kristoffer Nilsson (@krillenil) 's Twitter Profile Photo

A4: In a tightly coupled environment the analytics workload is in the same place at the cloud adoption maturity as the system that feeds it/the systems the analytics does feed. #saschat @CoreCompete

Kristoffer Nilsson (@krillenil) 's Twitter Profile Photo

A4: Where the input/output of data and decisions are more decoupled, such as systems where data is batched on a regular frequence, the analytics workload could be moved to cloud earlier to get the benefits on the scalability and flexibiity the cloud deliver. #saschat @CoreCompete

Kristoffer Nilsson (@krillenil) 's Twitter Profile Photo

A5: Focus on additional value generated and not only current cost savings. Things like flexibility and agility can be just as important,. The cloud migration is not only to cover what the requirements are today, but also to enable what they will be tomorrow. #saschat @CoreCompete

Kristoffer Nilsson (@krillenil) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Thanks for a really fun chat. Always a really interesting experience to see all different views on a subject lile this. Now back to the Swedish summer :) #saschat

SAS Institute Nordic (@sas_nordic) 's Twitter Profile Photo

🇸🇪 There is no contradiction between open and proprietary software - both types are needed says SAS's Kristoffer Nilsson. To find out the similarities and differences between the two read more here on Computer Sweden: 2.sas.com/6013GFj8l

🇸🇪 There is no contradiction between open and proprietary software - both types are needed says SAS's Kristoffer Nilsson. To find out the similarities and differences between the two read more here on Computer Sweden: 2.sas.com/6013GFj8l
Kristoffer Nilsson (@krillenil) 's Twitter Profile Photo

A1: IT, business, customers. Everyone. Having the possibility to adapt to customer needs in an efficient, cost effective and flexible manner is key to be able to provide services that quickly evolves with changed customer behaviors and needs. #SASchat #EnterpriseArchitecture

Kristoffer Nilsson (@krillenil) 's Twitter Profile Photo

A2: It has changed from planning for a future we think will come, to plan for agility. More focus on building something now that is adaptable, rather than putting months or years of planning in something that might never happen. #saschat #EnterpriseArchitecture

Kristoffer Nilsson (@krillenil) 's Twitter Profile Photo

A2: Both for it-systems and the organization the focus is on independent parts with clear purpose (and interface to each other). This moves monoliths to microservices, and clearly defined roles/processes to self-organizing teams. #saschat #EnterpriseArchitecture

Kristoffer Nilsson (@krillenil) 's Twitter Profile Photo

A3: Before we talked about Outsourcing, now we talk about XAAS. Before Service Oriented Architecture, now microservices. Before virtualization, now containers. Even though the toolbox has evolved the main drivers have stayed the same. #SASChat #EnterpriseArchitecture

Kristoffer Nilsson (@krillenil) 's Twitter Profile Photo

A4: To design in a way which fosters agility and speed. A clear architecture/direction is good, but not to the expense of innovation, speed and agility. There will be much more focus on enabling change, rather than implementing rigid structures. #SASChat #EnterpriseArchitecture