“𝙈𝙖𝙧𝙮, 𝙨𝙞𝙨𝙩𝙚𝙧 𝙤𝙛 𝘼𝙖𝙧𝙤𝙣”. 𝘿𝙞𝙙 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙌𝙪𝙧’𝙖𝙣 𝙘𝙤𝙣𝙛𝙪𝙨𝙚 𝙩𝙬𝙤 𝙈𝙖𝙧𝙮𝙨 𝙤𝙧 𝙧𝙖𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙞𝙩 𝙥𝙧𝙚𝙨𝙚𝙧𝙫𝙚𝙙 𝙖 𝙡𝙤𝙨𝙩 𝙅𝙪𝙙𝙚𝙤-𝘾𝙝𝙧𝙞𝙨𝙩𝙞𝙖𝙣 𝙩𝙧𝙖𝙙𝙞𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣? - Qur’an critics say it mistakenly identifies Mary the mother of Jesus as

𝙄𝙗𝙣 𝙏𝙖𝙮𝙢𝙞𝙮𝙮𝙖 (𝙙.728𝘼𝙃) 𝙦𝙪𝙤𝙩𝙚𝙙 𝙛𝙧𝙤𝙢 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙡𝙤𝙨𝙩 𝙗𝙤𝙤𝙠 ‘𝙖𝙡-𝘼𝙧𝙖’ 𝙬𝙖 𝙖𝙡-𝘿𝙞𝙮𝙖𝙣𝙖𝙩’ 𝙗𝙮 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙩𝙬𝙚𝙡𝙫𝙚𝙧 𝙨𝙝𝙞𝙖 𝙖𝙡-𝙃𝙖𝙨𝙖𝙣 𝙄𝙗𝙣 𝙈𝙪𝙨𝙖 𝙖𝙡-𝙉𝙖𝙬𝙗𝙖𝙠𝙝𝙩𝙞 𝙝𝙞𝙨 𝙬𝙤𝙧𝙙𝙨 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙨𝙝𝙞𝙖 𝙛𝙞𝙜𝙪𝙧𝙚𝙨

Anti Muslim christians: “Your Qur’an copied our scriptures”. Jews: “You christians copied our scriptures”. Sumerians, Akkadians, Babylonians, Ugaritics: “Hey Jews you copied our texts”

The irony of those who mention the jarh on Abu Hanifa, as the two greatest Imams of Jarh Wa Tadil both followed Abu Hanifa in fiqh. They are Yahya Ibn Sa'id al-Qattan and Yahya Ibn Ma’in. There would be no science of Jarh Wa Tadil without these followers of Abu Hanifa’s school.

When refuted he blocked me lol. Ibn Hibban was the one the Hanbali’s exiled for denying the hadd/limit of Allah. He and Bukhari were ahl al hadith who opposed ahl al ray. No big deal there. As for Ibn Abi Dawud the son of Abu Dawud, he was said to be a liar. Even if some

𝙄𝙗𝙣 𝙆𝙖𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙧 (𝙙.774𝘼𝙃) 𝙧𝙚𝙟𝙚𝙘𝙩𝙨 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙬𝙚𝙖𝙠 𝙝𝙖𝙙𝙞𝙩𝙝 𝙤𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙈𝙖𝙦𝙖𝙢 𝙖𝙡-𝙈𝙖𝙝𝙢𝙪𝙙 (𝙥𝙧𝙖𝙞𝙨𝙚𝙬𝙤𝙧𝙩𝙝𝙮 𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣) 𝙗𝙚𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙥𝙝𝙚𝙩 ﷺ 𝙨𝙚𝙖𝙩𝙚𝙙 𝙤𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙧𝙤𝙣𝙚 𝙣𝙚𝙭𝙩 𝙩𝙤 𝘼𝙡𝙡𝙖𝙝 (𝙩𝙝𝙚

As someone who doesn’t call himself an Ashari or Maturidi and not a fan of kalam, why do I post often defending these two creedal groups? The answer is simple: To defend such a large segment of the muslims against the takfir directed at them by their theological foes. It does

The Prophet (ﷺ) said: "I and the person who looks after an orphan and provides for him, will be in Paradise like this," putting his index and middle fingers together. [Sahih Bukhari] For all the literalists who say pointing to the hand, ear or eye meant hand, eye and ear for

Don’t make your religion revolve all around one or two personalities who were not even prophets. To the point where you defend every single thing they ever said or did as if they were infallible. Yes defend them against unjust hate, but also acknowledge they were human and

Hilarious

All you Abu Hanifa haters cope on this

Imam Ahmad Ibn Hanbal would have been just a muhadith if not for Abu Hanifa. Think about that…

A peak into my language: If a Maliki says “Imam Malik took from the home of the prophet ﷺ i.e Medina, so sit back down Hanafi” I’d be nodding my head saying no lies told. If a Shafi said “Our Imam brought together the jurists and the hadith scholars, so sit back down Hanafi”

How are non Hindi speaking people knowing what was said in this Indian debate? Wasn’t it in Hindi? Is there some translated video that non Indians have been going off?

The people who love Imam Abu Hanifa defeated those who hate him once again. A small little known account that belongs to a nobody, with little followers was supported by muslims who mopped the floor clean with the haters of Imam Abu Hanifa. Thanks to Allah. Shout out to those

𝙄𝙗𝙣 𝙏𝙖𝙮𝙢𝙞𝙮𝙮𝙖 𝙨𝙖𝙮𝙨 𝙬𝙝𝙤𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙧 𝙙𝙚𝙘𝙡𝙖𝙧𝙚𝙨 𝘼𝙗𝙪 𝙃𝙖𝙣𝙞𝙛𝙖 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙤𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙨 𝙡𝙞𝙠𝙚 𝙝𝙞𝙢 𝙛𝙧𝙤𝙢 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙄𝙢𝙖𝙢𝙨 𝙤𝙛 𝙄𝙨𝙡𝙖𝙢 𝙩𝙤 𝙗𝙚 𝙪𝙣𝙗𝙚𝙡𝙞𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙧𝙨, 𝙖𝙧𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙢𝙨𝙚𝙡𝙫𝙚𝙨 𝙢𝙤𝙧𝙚 𝙙𝙚𝙨𝙚𝙧𝙫𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙤𝙛 𝙩𝙖𝙠𝙛𝙞𝙧 𝙖𝙣𝙙