The whole point of science is to understand reality. So to say that science is checked against reality is circular.

This is, again, another brilliantly written piece of rhetoric from Dylan. His articles and posts are always masterfully written. However, just like his last article, no matter how well written it is it is fundamentally flawed. There are at minimum 4 logical fallacies that he

"I appeal to my intuition and to the long suffered rules put in place by man". You mean the morals given by religion. Religion is a foundational block of all civilizations. Every one. So every moral that exists, exists inside a religious frame. There are no "secular" morals.

🚨BREAKING: DOJ charges the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) with wire fraud, false statements, and conspiracy to commit money laundering. The SPLC secretly funneled $3M+ in donor funds to violent racist extremist groups: -Ku Klux Klan -American Nazi Party -Aryan Nation

Yep ... Pretty much

I find it quite concerning the number of times I've seen atheists completely disregard AI in debates and arguments. Have they become luddites? When a technology exists that can advance human understanding and knowledge, why wouldn't you use it for research and debates? 🤔

So not only does this winner think that a blue check mark makes you a moron - I'm sure there are some really deep seated issues to uncover there - but he apparently doesn't know that there are AI platforms other than Grok. And Grok is free too, just not in the posts. Ever heard

Why do atheists refuse logic?

New Evidence Reveals Judas Received His 30 Pieces Of Silver From The SPLC buff.ly/gKgAGAQ

It was refuted, but not successfully. The refutal commits a category error and is therefore fundamentally flawed.

It's pretty much impossible to remove religion from your life and remain moral. All of society's morals are either explicitly religious or were derived from a religion. Every. Single. One. You may not go to church, or temple, or synagogue, but you practice religion every single

Who is John Gault?

He gave one very specific condition. He spent the rest of the chapter explicitly forbidding it. Marriage should be upheld at all costs. If you can't do that, then do not marry. That's what the entirety of the chapter boils down to.

This should be shared the world over. It's a powerful and obvious struggle of the soul.

Very profound and powerful.

Your premise is clever but dishonest, You assert that fathers = fact and God = belief. There is logical evidence for the existence of God (fact).

Help my friend out with this survey.

That's because he can't. None of them (atheists) can. All they can do is dodge and deflect. To directly address one of the original argument's premises: Because atheism requires brute facts about universal creation, Parsimony actually favors the theists. Never forget that.

Why Christians? Why not all theists? I wasn't aware that Christianity was the only other counter explanation to atheism. Shame on you for not including all the other religions.

Engineer here. Fact check: False