@jryckman3 : A journal with an impact factor of 45 published this work. Rad onc journals have an IF of ~5, and yet, an NCDB study like this would have never seen the light of day if we would have strictly looked at radiotherapy without accounting for, say, surgery or systemic therapy. • TwiCopy

Jeff Ryckman

@jryckman3

+ Follow

Medical Physicist turned MD | Dedicated to LR-PFS 🎯, QoL, isotoxicity ⚖️, constraints 🙅‍♀️, & reproducibility 📊 | Creator of @RadOncReview | #RadOncCalc

ID: 85858016

linkhttps://radonccalc.radoncreview.org/ calendar_today28-10-2009 16:48:48

10,10K Tweet

4,4K Takipçi

3,3K Takip Edilen

Jeff Ryckman

@jryckman3

a month ago

A journal with an impact factor of 45 published this work. Rad onc journals have an IF of ~5, and yet, an NCDB study like this would have never seen the light of day if we would have strictly looked at radiotherapy without accounting for, say, surgery or systemic therapy.

thumb_up_off_alt28

chat_bubble_outline2

repeat3

shareShare