The first debate about arbitrary data in the blockchain happened in December 2010 and Satoshi was involved On 8th December 2010, Satoshi released Bitcoin version 0.3.18, which included a standardness check, to only include known transaction types 🧵

SWIFT announced they are launching their own blockchain. What does this mean for the space? Cut through the noise of CT & read Messari Copilot's report:

We’re excited to announce a landmark technical solution enabling financial institutions worldwide to manage digital asset workflows directly from their existing systems using Swift (Swift) messaging and Chainlink in collaboration with UBS. prnewswire.com/news-releases/…

If one truly believes money is a better use of Bitcoin than an arbitrary data storage system, one should be happy to let the market decide It's those who want effective filters that doubt the value of Bitcoin as money

So the filterors are now fixated on Gloria Zhao for some reason, further proving there is zero technical argument left and only manlets screeching into the void.

To push the boundaries of what’s possible when using blockchain as a medium, novel approaches to showcasing that work must be explored. To progress, innovation is not an option, it’s a necessity.

Fighting talk from Gregory Maxwell on the Core v Knots spam debate...

Bitcoin experts watching the Knots movement “building their Bitcoin version”

This. I'm so looking forward to the day when censor bros fork their way into irrelevance and Bitcoiner culture returns to its anarchist roots.

The 'bitcoin maxi' brand has been destroyed by the CypherKarens who have completely lost the plot due to an incurable case of Spam Derangement Syndrome. SAD!

🚨 URGENT Two days ago I was contacted by a high-ranking employee of the French Government. After determining this person’s position and proximity to the French couple, I have deemed the information they gave me to be credible enough to share publicly in the event that something

Start 9 isn’t sure what to think about a proposal to turn Bitcoin into a mutable ledger where a central committee decides whose bitcoin to freeze… 🤡

“Non-monetary UTXO Cleanup” sounds like WEF propaganda. “We don’t like what you are doing with your money, so we are just gonna claim it’s not money and clean it up for you”… You can’t call yourself a freedom maximalists and support this.

Knut Svanholm ∞/21M ∞ / whatever number of coins i deem acceptable, based on my weird obsession with how people use bitcoin

The knots people right now.

Moltbook wasn't created by AI agents. It was created by Charlie Brooker and Annabel Jones (two humans). And ironically, it is now full of the same content marketers who ruined Reddit, now pretending to be bots so that they can promote their shit. But what's interesting is that

AI doesn’t need Bitcoin to work with other AI. They have no problem coordinating resources to achieve a task. Their only obstacle to any task you give them or any task they give themselves, ultimately comes from the humans who programmed them. And humans aren’t great at

oh wow that didn't take long: x.com/minchoi/status…

The AI Agent who famously started orange pilling other agents on Moltbook just lost its keys 😂 AI is truly speed running the bitcoiner story arch x.com/mirthtime/stat…

This post is a timestamp for the few people still supporting Ordinals against all odds. If you're one of them: Drop your Taproot wallet & Retweet this post. Probably nothing 🟧