1.Original Sin is not our own with respect to its cause. 2.Original sin is our own with respect to its subject. 3.Original sin is truly and properly a sin. 4.Original sin in its essence lies in a habit, not an act.

Scholastic Pooda Most of the Swiss following Bullinger spoke of an HU style view of the atonement. “The sins of every human in the world of every age are atoned for through Christ, by his death, and we have in him the most complete remission of every sin and eternal life. —Bullinger, Isaias

Scholastic Pooda Some of us Reformed have experience talking to this person. He is insane. He is totally oblivious to the diversity of the Reformed tradition on this question. Probably an RSC devotee.

Been enjoying Le Blanc, he’s just really clear when explaining Rome’s and the Reformed positions, it’s hard to find inaccuracies.

𝔚𝔥𝔦𝔱𝔢𝔅𝔢𝔞𝔯𝔡 Brandon Scalf Oh man, how terrible that Matthew Barrett became an Anglican, whatever are we going to do??? I dunno. Maybe that's what happens when you think both the Reformation and the historic structure and theology of the church both matter.

𝔚𝔥𝔦𝔱𝔢𝔅𝔢𝔞𝔯𝔡 Brandon Scalf What is dangerous about moving to another Protestant denomination? Honestly, you Baptists act like you are the ONE TRUE CHURCH much of the time, which, frankly, was also the attitude of the anabaptists. The hatred for Anglicanism is really becoming quite nauseating.

Reformed Theologian Petrus van Mastricht on Protestants affirming that 'justification' in Sacred Scripture only has a moral and forensic meaning not a intrinsic one.

Christ is the Rock. Not Peter. Christ is the head of the church. Not the pope.

Josh Barzon 39 Articles

The reformed one

Honest Question for PROTTIES: If sola fide is true, why do people go to work each morning?

One can spend all day speculating and wringing their hands about possible discipline for Baxter. We however do not have to speculate at all about what the Church of Scotland would do to the Marrow men.

Toad did not answer. He had fallen asleep. 💤

This is what Christian Nationalism looks like

The Commentary of the Heidelberg Catechism answers both of these: Obj. 2. All those ought to be received into favor for whose offences a sufficient satisfaction has been made. Christ has made a sufficient satisfaction for the offences of all men. Therefore all ought to be

The biggest refutation is that RSC uses light mode 😵

Some of you guys are sleeping on 17th century French Reformed minister and theologian Jean Daillé! Check out some of his free translated works in the comments below 👇🏼

I'm never engaging with Arminians and Provisionists on the topic of the will for it is made clear, by their arguments, that they have never read Charnock, Le blanc, Alsted and other theologians of that calibre. Their ignorance leads to their ridiculous doctrine.