A people allegedly starving - that could change their situation in a moment by releasing hostages and ending the war that they started, and yet does not. Who, according to neutral mediators, do not even negotiate seriously. How can this be explained?

Will the ICRC be able to use the humanitarian pause to visit the hostages? UN Human Rights do you know maybe?

So we now know that the suffering child in “the” had a genetic condition, which explains why his mother and brother looked much better. If there is mass starvation in Gaza, why do all the pictures turn out to be fakes? Maybe the situation has been misunderstood?

Question for Keir Starmer: will all terrorist murderers and kidnappers be rewarded, or just those who attack Israel?

“But Albanese and Wong would not say whether Australia would withdraw recognition if the Palestinian Authority reneges on its promise of reform.” No more needs to be said.

“Under international law, to become a nation an area must have a permanent population, a defined territory, a government and the capacity to enter into relations with other states.” Keir Starmer et al - are you not the ones demanding adherence to international law?

The writer of an Israel-hating screed in The Age styles herself “a third-generation Palestinian refugee”. No other refugee can bequeath their status ad infinitum except Palestinians. Why? And where is my right to be recognised as an a 80th-generation Judean refugee?

The IPC changed the definition of famine in order to blame Israel. Amnesty changed the definition of genocide in order to blame Israel. +972 changed the definition of a civilian (to include unidentified terrorists) in order to blame Israel. There’s a pattern here.

"Sir" Ed Davey News is boycotting the state dinner in honour of Trump. But he was quite happy to dress up and honour the dictatorial, Hamas-financing Emir of Qatar.

Has anyone noticed that Hamas has not agreed to the deal? Especially those politicians who just recognised “Palestine” and assured us that Hamas would have no role in the future of Gaza? Do they care that Hamas is insisting on having that role?

No demonstrations demanding that Hamas agree to a ceasefire. It was never about a ceasefire. Never about ending the “genocide” or the “famine”. It was only ever about a Hamas victory, and as far as the Israel-haters will fight to the last Gazan for that victory.

Am I happy about this deal? Yes!  Am I super angry about this deal? Yes! Am I proud of this deal? Yes! Am I disappointed about this deal? Yes!  Am I hopeful about this deal? Yes!  Am I petrified by this deal? Yes!!  So here’s a shocker for you. Life isn’t social media.

30 Gazans executed by Hamas - 7 gruesomely in public. Where are the protests?

Yet again. We cease; they fire.

Chilul Hashem on an industrial scale.

Sally Rooney objects to the “shocking mistreatment” of Palestine Action-affiliated prisoners who are on hunger strike, saying she fears for their welfare. Yet I do not recall her expressing any fears for the hostages when they were in Hamas's terror dungeons.