
Ranjith Jaganathan
@ranjith_cogsci
He/him | Cognitive Science Researcher ๐ง | Hon.Adjunct Faculty @NIAS_India | Prev: @NYUAbuDhabi, @NIMHANS_BLR, @cogsci_iitk | neuromatch.social/@JRanjith
ID: 221280923
http://linkedin.com/in/ranjithjaganathan 30-11-2010 06:45:21
195 Tweet
403 Takipรงi
4,4K Takip Edilen







Our review on the theoretical status of oscillations and field potentials is out! What are their causal effects, and what can electrophysiology signals reveal about how the brain works? w/ Dan Levenstein Matt Krause Bradley Voytek Richard Gao cell.com/trends/cognitiโฆ

This is interesting as a first large diffusion-based LLM. Most of the LLMs you've been seeing are ~clones as far as the core modeling approach goes. They're all trained "autoregressively", i.e. predicting tokens from left to right. Diffusion is different - it doesn't go left to




๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฐ๐๐ถ๐๐ฒ ๐ฏ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ถ๐ป Interesting review on spontaneous activity and predictions. Idea of "predictions" is natural (could it be otherwise?) but emphasis on constructing models of world not persuasive. Bayesian motivation is vague imo. doi.org/10.1016/j.neurโฆ



New paper on the generalization of Flow Matching arxiv.org/abs/2506.03719 ๐คฏ Why does flow matching generalize? Did you know that the flow matching target you're trying to learn **can only generate training points**? with Quentin Bertrand, Anne Gagneux & Rรฉmi Emonet ๐๐๐


๐ง๐ผ๐ฝ-๐ฑ๐ผ๐๐ป ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐ฏ๐ผ๐๐๐ผ๐บ-๐๐ฝ ๐ป๐ฒ๐๐ฟ๐ผ๐๐ฐ๐ถ๐ฒ๐ป๐ฐ๐ฒ: ๐ผ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฐ๐ผ๐บ๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฐ๐น๐ฎ๐๐ต ๐ผ๐ณ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฐ๐ต ๐ฐ๐๐น๐๐๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ nature.com/articles/s4158โฆ Small contribution in piece by Fernando Rosas ๐ฆ and colleagues on how we need both types of research culture
