🔥The 9th Round of Easy Loan, Earn $40 Reward is in progress❗️ ⏰ Promotion Period: January 15th - Feburary 15th, 2025 👉 Register now and check more details at gate.io/campaigns/358

Expect a barrage of claims that Israel's attack was disproportionate, unjustified, escalatory, reckless, excessive, unnecessary, etc. But Iran’s regime declared, without ambiguity, its intent to destroy Israel. Israel had every right to strike now to defend its existence.

Of course Iran is targeting civilians in Israel. Why would they behave any differently than the terror proxies they fund like Hamas & the Houthis? No surprise fake NGOs, fake IHL “experts” and usual Israel-haters are running cover for Iran. Further exposing exactly who they are.

This is the trash coming out of +972 Magazine and the virulent anti-Zionism of Israel’s fringe, always elevated by foreign media. Writer Orly Noy calls even the 1948 War of Independence a "pyrrhic victory"—because in her view, the real tragedy was that a Jewish state was formed.

The Iranian regime's TV station that has spread incitement & genocidal intent against Israel is a legitimate target. Just like when NATO bombed Serbian State TV in 1999. Blair called it an "apparatus of dictatorship and power of Milosevic." NATO considered it a military target.

🧵Article in New York Magazine claims war crimes in Gaza. FIRST example of strike presented as criminal does not disclose that it targeted a Hamas commander, tunnel network (NOT the buildings) with many secondary explosions. Suzy Hansen why did you omit this critical information? Sources: 1/

Full response and rebuttal of this trash New York Magazine article coming out soon. Hansen knew the outcome of her "research" well before it was written, and we all knew too when she relied on Ken Roth for lots of her "evidence."