Ironic Capital (@ironic_capital) 's Twitter Profile
Ironic Capital

@ironic_capital

Focused on Mining, Energy, Hydrogen, Shitcos and the idiocy of group think.

ironiccapital.co

ID: 1487595701517254656

linkhttps://research.ironiccapital.co/ calendar_today30-01-2022 01:17:22

2,2K Tweet

1,1K Followers

429 Following

Aidan Morrison (@footnotesguy) 's Twitter Profile Photo

It's pretty to easy to see how utterly debased the CSIRO modelling underpinnning the economic claims regarding the 2035 targets is. They assume the whole world is committed to Paris targets, ie. Net Zero. They don't have any baseline where that doesn't happen. 1/

It's pretty to easy to see how utterly debased the <a href="/CSIRO/">CSIRO</a> modelling underpinnning the economic claims regarding the 2035 targets is. 

They assume the whole world is committed to Paris targets, ie. Net Zero.  They don't have any baseline where that doesn't happen. 1/
Alexander Stahel 🌻 (@burggrabenh) 's Twitter Profile Photo

There’s zero reason the West can’t get nuclear construction costs back to $2.5/W. We’ve been there before. Hinkley Point C (£12.5/W), Olkiluoto 3 (€6.9/W), and Flamanville 3 (€8.3/W) are one-offs. EDF builds one EPR every 5 years. No scale, no learning, plenty of safety

There’s zero reason the West can’t get nuclear construction costs back to $2.5/W. We’ve been there before.

Hinkley Point C (£12.5/W), Olkiluoto 3 (€6.9/W), and Flamanville 3 (€8.3/W) are one-offs. EDF builds one EPR every 5 years. No scale, no learning, plenty of safety
Ironic Capital (@ironic_capital) 's Twitter Profile Photo

How is this IEA (global) Net Zero scenario even credible? 25MMBBL/d oil for 10B people? This is either a mass extinction level event, or some sort of extremely low cost nuclear renaissance with war like supply chain build out. Would want the tech ready now for a ~20 year build