Invoking Theism (@invokingtheism) 's Twitter Profile
Invoking Theism

@invokingtheism

Synthesizing philosophy, science, and spirituality.

official Twitter page for the Invoking Theism YouTube channel.

ID: 1072552785688723457

linkhttps://www.youtube.com/channel/UCcXdCHoaSy0kNSv-KwjiSqQ calendar_today11-12-2018 18:04:45

4,4K Tweet

2,2K Followers

176 Following

Invoking Theism (@invokingtheism) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Just as there are thomists, a large mission of mine is to advance and amplify Swinburne’s system of natural theology — making Swinburnians. It would revolutionize the intellectual heritage of a serious Christian theism.

Invoking Theism (@invokingtheism) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Most concise definition of Theism I'm able to come up with: Theism: There exists an entity of an omnipotent kind whose actions are normatively constrained by axiological-theoretic reasons.

Adherent Apologetics (@aapologetics) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Tim Howard (@InvokingTheism) joined me to respond to a Richard Dawkins video on five arguments against God. Check it out! youtu.be/zUEfOtR7i2w

Tim Howard (@InvokingTheism) joined me to respond to a Richard Dawkins video on five arguments against God. Check it out!

youtu.be/zUEfOtR7i2w
Invoking Theism (@invokingtheism) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Let this be an object lesson for everyone. In order for this apologist to advance his project, he has to erroneously quote-mine an expert in conciliar christology. Worse than that, he literally left in the very next paragraph that directly refutes his interpretation.

Exploring Reality (@exploringreali2) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Deen : THAN COMMITTED HERESY. Then refuses to dig into the philosophy, listen to my clarifications, or the testimony of many people who know my position. Also Deen when defending himself: “you can’t judge someone’s intentions especially when they’re telling you their

Exploring Reality (@exploringreali2) 's Twitter Profile Photo

My name is Libyano, and I like to lie and clip farm after debates to save face because my best answer to Mike was "I'm not a historian". BTW nice negative canthal tilt.

Invoking Theism (@invokingtheism) 's Twitter Profile Photo

This is not a true dichotomy. This assumes that one cannot predicate <is God> to the Father and <is God> to the Son via reduplicative predication where both the Father and the Son are incomplete individuals. Why should we believe that? So far, no argument has been given.