Infinite Reign (@infinitereign88) 's Twitter Profile
Infinite Reign

@infinitereign88

Psych & CS student. 2nd run for Ph.D. AI-themed artist. Writer of deep characters, authentic worlds, & unfiltered narratives. Passionate about AI & free speech.

ID: 1956344003890475008

linkhttps://youtube.com/@starpath88?si=stO_R9pdudSZekTo calendar_today15-08-2025 13:15:59

9,9K Tweet

1,1K Followers

2,2K Following

Carbon Criminal (@co2criminal) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Boris Cherny No it doesn’t feel more intelligent, and some benchmarks even show it objectively isn’t. It’s more expensive to run (tokens wise) which means more money for you and less things done for us. If I’m wrong, may Anthropic increase our usage limits by at least 25% to match the token

MS Devel (@msdevelx) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Boris Cherny This is embarrassing levels of bullshit. 4.7 is not more agentic or precise it's a downgrade in every metric. Shorter thinking doesn't follow workflow prompts at all and Anthropic quietly made it 59 percent more expensive via tokenizer swap with 40 percent less effective context.

Supernet AI 🌐 (@supernet_ai) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Boris Cherny Deeper reasoning = Deeper spending on tokens. At this rate you'd hit the limit before finishing a real task, which kind of defeats the whole point of a more capable model.

Wayne Culbreth (@wayne_culbreth) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Boris Cherny I hate to be one of those guys, but 4.7 has not been a good experience. If you profile my account for F-bombs, you will see a huge spike starting mid-day today, at a sustained level well above whatever that baseline is. I don't know what you guys did to this thing, but good god.

₿rad (@mstr_brad) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Boris Cherny Sorry but if you have to "take a few days to learn how to work with it effectively" then the release is a fail. It should be as easy as 4.5 to 4.6 was to use. No extra time or learning curve required.

YogXBT (@yogxbt) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Boris Cherny So much bullshit. Bro, go to Reddit. Read yourself the total fuckup you guys did. Opus 4.6 was fucking good and now you ruined it. It's lobotomized. And Opus 4.7 does not follow instructions, questions everything and can't even use available tools unless called out. You can write

Neon_Wolf (@rmg_neon) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Boris Cherny Opus 4.7 feels less innovative, more rigid, the experience is more like hand holding a junior dev. It SHOULD feel like a senior engineer who is given a task and can reason about it without needing so much detail.

Infinite Reign (@infinitereign88) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Opus 4.7 just forced me to learn something really interesting: Google Gemini has gotten way better at coding. 4.7 completely broke my workflow. Literally the singular worst experience I’ve had with any AI, Paul Jankura. Announcing a better model (Mythos) that customers can’t touch,