Some people seem to believe this principle hinges on what the protesters’ beliefs are.

“The most violent and unhinged statements are coming not from the periphery of the protests but from their leadership, because the most committed members of these groups have most thoroughly absorbed their radical commitments and relentless dehumanization of political opponents.“

Comparing past few weeks to the civil rights movement is insulting to that struggle and not factual.

There’s a difference between that which John Lewis would call “Good Trouble” and stuff that is destructive lawlessness.

Lol

'It’s the U.S. government’s first attempt to regulate automated driving functions and is likely to help curb some of the problems that have surfaced with driver-assist and fully automated driving systems'

'We need to make sure we set high performance standards' - Secretary Pete Buttigieg

I think the University of Chicago president's note on protests and encampments is very much worth reading, for several reasons

1. Clear statement of values: Free speech, even when it's offensive, is a paramount value to be protected on college campuses—except when it comes into

🥳New papers! A cornucopia! (well, 3).🎆

#1: 'What State Housing Policies Do Voters Want? Evidence from a Platform-Choice Experiment' (w/Clayton Nall & Stan Oklobdzija)

written for a JPIPE symposium on political economy of housing

papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…

🧵/21

*legal scholar klaxon*

Just stumbled upon this almost 5-year-old thread. What a classic - totally lucid description of a problem that's absolutely everywhere. I think about this a lot and am rounding the corner right now on a 3-parter of articles about this problem in local government.

I’m not sure how much the Fed matters for large caps right now. Capital allocation decisions seem not to be externally constrained.