We got a bad deal out of Brexit because from day one, Starmer and his bitter Remainers plotted and betrayed it. They still are….

#Brexit 1. We voted to be sovereign on laws 2. Brexit has not caused an 8% GDP loss 3. Exports to the EU have increased 4. Ex EU exports have increased 5. We have trade deals with CPTPP 6. Trade deals with India/ AUS/ NZ/ 7. EU out-trades UK 3-1 on Agri 8. EU’s declining more

Starmer and Reeves would rather pay people to do nothing than pay to defend the nation - leaving us more vulnerable than at any time in our history

If you hits the streets because of gang rapes = riot police If you hit the streets in masks, call for jihad and chant for terrorist groups = regular police

The Chancellor blames the Iran war whose effects are not yet in the numbers for her dire performance so far. Her cost of living squeeze comes from her destructive tax attack on business and jobs, and her sky high energy prices. She is rapidly closing UK industry down.

A year ago the Supreme Court settled what most people already knew: Sex means biological sex. It should have ended there. The question now is whether Keir Starmer has the backbone to act. So far the answer is no. Conservative councils aren’t waiting, we are applying the law.

After being told off by the Speaker yesterday, Keir Starmer threw a tantrum afterwards and stomped out of parliament. If he reacts like that after being told to simply answer a question, imagine how bad he’ll react after May 7th. It will be glorious.

If South Africa doesn’t change its super racist Apartheid 2.0 laws, the country must be sanctioned

We now have the Government response: Neither the PM nor 10 Downing Street nor the Cabinet Office knew the Foreign Office had decided to ignore the fact Mandelson had failed his security vetting. Call it the ‘know-nothing’ government. But it leaves a major question unanswered:

It's been a dodgy, undemocratic circus from start to finish. From Sue Gray, to winter fuel allowance, to inheritance tax, to Chagos, to sugar daddy, Lord Alli, to assisted suicide, abortion law changes, McSweeney & Mandelson, the Chancellor blubbing in parliament. The

Just read on X a pile of old shit from Sky’s alleged political editor Beth Rigby in which she trotted out Starmer’s defence that he didn’t know Mandelson had failed his security vetting, That’s not her job. Starmer has comms to do that. Her job, on behalf of viewers/voters is

And let us not forget that at one stage Starmer was implicitly blaming the vetting process for letting Mandelson through — ‘both due diligence and security vetting need to be looked at again,’ he said. Turns out the vetting process did its job. And was overruled.

No wonder Starmer punched the Speakers chair on Wednesday. He knew then, his lies to Parliament were about to be exposed. It’s over. His reputation in shreds. His time as PM a total failure.

Why didn’t the PM tell the Commons on Wednesday about Mandelson’s vetting? Why did it take him so long to find out when the Commons had demanded to see the papers? His defence to accusations of lies is he is incompetent.

If a Minister misleads Parliament he must immediately come to the House and correct the record. The PM knew on Tuesday that he had misled Parliament but on Wednesday he did PMQ and didn’t mention it. Avoiding Parliamentary scrutiny. The cover up always causes the downfall !

It isn’t remotely credible to believe that neither Starmer nor any Minister knew Mandelson had failed the vetting process. Knowing civil servants as I do, they are extremely cautious, conscientious individuals who would have rushed to the Minister to tell them & certainly would

There are rumours that it was Mandelson’s China links that made him fail the vetting… When you look at the Embassy deal and other matters, you have to ask… Is Keir Starmer compromised?

I accepted not receiving my State Pension until I’m 67yrs instead of 60yrs because we were told the country couldn’t afford it, but it grates on me now when they have been able to find the money for unknown people that have rocked up on our shores who have never contributed a

OK, this is getting ridiculous now. No.10 has also begun claiming Olly Robbins was precluded by the rules from sharing information on the vetting. So why did No.10 sack him. If, as they are now asserting, he simply followed the rules.