Equal Protection SC (@epsouthcarolina) 's Twitter Profile
Equal Protection SC

@epsouthcarolina

equalprotectionsc.org

ID: 1770886164968345600

calendar_today21-03-2024 18:52:35

327 Tweet

237 Takipçi

69 Takip Edilen

Equal Protection SC (@epsouthcarolina) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Breaking News in South Carolina. Despite numerous calls to amend to conform to equal protection, s.1095 passes out of subcommittee and now heads to full committee. While this does not provide equal legal protection from fertilization, it does contain criminal penalties for all

Foundation to Abolish Abortion (@abolitionistfaa) 's Twitter Profile Photo

❗️ Students for Life Action is calling on South Carolina lawmakers to advance S. 1095, saying the effort is based on their model legislation. This claim seems dubious since their model legislation includes immunity clauses for women who willfully have abortions, while S. 1095 allows women to

❗️ <a href="/SFLAction/">Students for Life Action</a> is calling on South Carolina lawmakers to advance S. 1095, saying the effort is based on their model legislation.

This claim seems dubious since their model legislation includes immunity clauses for women who willfully have abortions, while S. 1095 allows women to
Ben Zeisloft (@benzeisloft) 's Twitter Profile Photo

This is a very interesting development… Students for Life of America | Pro-Life Gen usually opposes bills that penalize women who have abortions, and yet they are taking credit for a bill to imprison such women for as many as two years. There are a few possibilities here… 1. Students for Life of America | Pro-Life Gen somehow

Lizzie Marbach (@lizziemarbach) 's Twitter Profile Photo

This is the kind of culture that the prolife movement created via the second victim narrative and incremental bills. ⬇️ Where women are so brazenly evil that they film it & brag to the whole world that they sacrificed their child.

Lizzie Marbach (@lizziemarbach) 's Twitter Profile Photo

VP of Students for Life of America | Pro-Life Gen openly saying that will pull support from a bill if they don’t add an immunity clause for women who murder their babies. Either you believe abortion is murder or you don’t. Either you believe babies deserve equal justice or you don’t. This is an

Equal Protection SC (@epsouthcarolina) 's Twitter Profile Photo

They can’t even stomach a MISDEMEANOR penalty with a maximum of 2 years in prison and/or $1000 fine for women who willfully kill their unborn child. 🤦🏻‍♂️

Equal Protection SC (@epsouthcarolina) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Why is the VP of Students for Life Action threatening to pull support of S.1095 if they do not remove the one (very minor) deterrent of a MISDEMEANOR for mothers who willfully kill their unborn child? As a comparison South Carolina punishes stealing a bicycle, damaging a utility box, or

Foundation to Abolish Abortion (@abolitionistfaa) 's Twitter Profile Photo

🚨 Pro-Life establishment group @LifeForSC recently commended South Carolina lawmakers for passing their pregnancy center tax credit bill. Beyond this particular legislation, @LifeForSC notoriously opposes equal protection of the laws for preborn babies, often lobbying against

🚨 Pro-Life establishment group @LifeForSC recently commended South Carolina lawmakers for passing their pregnancy center tax credit bill.

Beyond this particular legislation, @LifeForSC notoriously opposes equal protection of the laws for preborn babies, often lobbying against
Ben Zeisloft (@benzeisloft) 's Twitter Profile Photo

This is important to understand… 1. Major pro-life group opposes abolition. 2. Major pro-life group supports weaker bill. 3. Major pro-life group shows weaker bill to supporters as a massive anti-abortion victory. 4. Major pro-life group has funds and support to oppose

Equal Protection SC (@epsouthcarolina) 's Twitter Profile Photo

📣 Call to Action! S1095 still doesn’t provide equal legal protection for unborn children, and the committee hearing is tomorrow at 9am. Under current SC law, mothers have legal immunity for at‑home abortions. As written, S.1095 would end that immunity by adding a misdemeanor

📣 Call to Action! S1095 still doesn’t provide equal legal protection for unborn children, and the committee hearing is tomorrow at 9am. Under current SC law, mothers have legal immunity for at‑home abortions. As written, S.1095 would end that immunity by adding a misdemeanor
Ben Zeisloft (@benzeisloft) 's Twitter Profile Photo

🔥 Jeff Durbin contrasts the strategy of the apostles and historic church that turned the world upside down with the careful and cowardly strategy of the pro-life establishment. 🎥 Seth Gruber

Ben Zeisloft (@benzeisloft) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Today pro-abortion reporter Jessica Valenti ran a story about Students for Life of America | Pro-Life Gen endorsing S. 1095 in South Carolina, which includes misdemeanor penalties for women who willfully have abortions. Because Jessica Valenti is a consistently sloppy reporter and Students for Life of America | Pro-Life Gen was

Today pro-abortion reporter <a href="/JessicaValenti/">Jessica Valenti</a> ran a story about <a href="/StudentsforLife/">Students for Life of America | Pro-Life Gen</a> endorsing S. 1095 in South Carolina, which includes misdemeanor penalties for women who willfully have abortions.

Because <a href="/JessicaValenti/">Jessica Valenti</a> is a consistently sloppy reporter and <a href="/StudentsforLife/">Students for Life of America | Pro-Life Gen</a> was
Equal Protection SC (@epsouthcarolina) 's Twitter Profile Photo

While this Bill falls woefully short of Equal Protection, this does provide a good indication of the Overton window moving in the right direction!

Equal Protection SC (@epsouthcarolina) 's Twitter Profile Photo

🚨 Breaking 🚨 Gubernatorial candidates asked if they would support S.1095, the abortion ban bill passed out of Committee today in the Senate. All candidates said they would not support it and many would VETO the bill, except Ralph Norman for Governor who said he would sign it!

🚨 Breaking 🚨 Gubernatorial candidates asked if they would support S.1095, the abortion ban bill passed out of Committee today in the Senate. All candidates said they would not support it and many would VETO the bill, except <a href="/RalphNorman/">Ralph Norman for Governor</a> who said he would sign it!