A private prosecution may be shut down by the CPS - as per supreme court ruling - there is no common law jurisdiction anymore. You are living in soviet Britain. supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uks…

Jacob Rees-Mogg The King can do no wrong; but still he has not the power, neither by natural Right nor Law, to cause Injury to his subjects; either by his own hand or, by the hand of his servants (officers, ministers, and HIS government). Our Law and Constitution is such that this is not

Just so you now … The people pretending to be the good guys are evil. And the people the media call evil are the good guys.

Jacob Rees-Mogg He might be a 'rejoiner' (as you very kindly put it) at heart, but as with those that preceded him in both dragging us into that union, and those that did everything in their power to hinder our exit even after we gave our express consent to leave, he is an out and out TRAITOR of

Rupert Lowe MP Parliament Act 1911 was the cause of that. Prior to this act MPs were virtually all businessmen. Who gave back to the community via public service. They were NOT paid a salary. The Fabian Society via the Labour Party (which the Fabians created) pushed through the act.

Ultra Vires repeals of The English Bill of Rights 1688/9 1. Bill of Rights 1688, the declaration and Declaration of reasons are God given rights inalienable. 2. ECHR are qualifiable. The Government and Judges decide whether the right applies.

@Constitutional Checks🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Lotuseaters.com Fr Calvin Robinson The American first amendment came from England and the English. Not Britain or the British. Learn your legal history. Whilst I don't like the UKColumn. This is a great article from Philip Ridley (except it was England NOT Britain) ukcolumn.org/article/britai…

Sharia in England? English Exit Jacob Rees-Mogg Nigel Farage MP Not on your nelly, 'illegal and pernicious' me 'ole china; contrary to the inherent ancient Rights and Liberties of the English People; and contrary to the terms of the 'original contract'. It has been expressly

Lotuseaters.com Fr Calvin Robinson To enact legislation which interferes with the fixed constituted processes required for good governance, is a subversion of what is constituted. To freely deliberate issues that affect us is paramount, owing to the fact that our thinking and decisions affect the way that we as

Coronation Oath: Why was the statutory wording changed? And on whose authority was it changed? I have now written to the Cabinet Office to ask why the wording of the King’s Coronation Oath was changed from the statutory wording as set out in the Coronation Oath Act 1688:

Live the full English show - rumble.com/v5j24t9-what-i…

UNN The Laws of England are the Birthright of our People, so yes we are under attack.

The King’s Coronation Oath: For those who want to see the exact wording of the Coronation Oath sworn by King Charles III at his Coronation in 2023, I attach a copy of it. For those of you who claim we are no longer a Christian nation, please note that you are incorrect.

It's so frustrating when people advocate for an English Bill of Rights, not knowing that England already has one. Fr Calvin Robinson Lois McLatchie Miller x.com/EnglishHistory…

Suky Spook Anna de Buisseret He is to govern us by our Law, which, is confirmed expressly in constitutional legislation as our Birthright. This he has taken a solemn oath to do. The original contract confirms the rights and liberties of the subject, and that all Monarchs are to preserve our religion, Law and

James McMurdock MP Very well said James. But how did we get to this state of affairs?

leilani dowding 🌸🚜 ☮️ These people are committing Treason and they are getting away with it because most English people do not know their Constitution. Robin Tilbrook English Democrats 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Jacob Rees-Mogg The Secret People Rupert Lowe MP